Why men rule: a theory of male dominance
The first edition of this book was lavishly praised by many authorities as the most formidable demonstration of an unpopular truth: males rule in all societies known to history or anthropology, for reasons arising from innate physiology, a brute fact that can never be conjured away by tinkering with social institutions. This new edition has been completely rewritten in the light of two decades of scholarship and debate, taking account of all published criticisms of earlier editions.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
A Question and Some Ground Rules
The Universality of Patriarchy
26 other sections not shown
aggression anthropological anthropologists aptitude areas argue argument attempt to explain authority biological causal central nervous system chess claim criticism demonstrate deny differentiation of dominance dominance behavior dominance tendency dyadic economic emotional empirical reality environment environmental environmentalist ethnographic evolutionary example exception exhibit existence fact fallacy feminine feminist fetal gender identity genius Green hermaphrodites hierarchy high-status roles hormonal human ignore imply important incorrect Inevitability of Patriarchy inevitable institutions we discuss invoke irrelevant John Money Leon Kamin limits logical male and female male attainment male dominance male physiology male-female male's manifested masculine mathematics matrilineal Mbuti merely motivation neuroendocrinological observation physiological differentiation physiological factor political possibility primates primitive societies psychophysiological reader reason refute relevant Semang sex differences sexual differences sexual differentiation social specific statistical status stereotype suprafamilial Tasaday testosterone testosterone levels tests theory presented universality of patriarchy upper hierarchical positions values variation Waorani woman women