Making Comparisons Count
This book attempts to answer two questions: Are alternatives for choice ever incomparable? and In what ways can items be compared? The arguments offered suggest that alternatives for choice no matter how different are never incomparable, and that the ways in which items can be compared are richer and more varied than commonly supposed.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
The Structure of Values and Comparisons of Bearers
The Normativity of Comparisons
Alternatives to Optimizing
Comparisons and Justifying Force
Is There Incomparability?
The Incomparability of Values
The Lack of a Common Value
Against Constitutive Incomparability
Other editions - View all
alternatives with respect argue belief that friendship better with respect Broome Broome's brute desire bundles of contributory cardinal comparisons career Cass Sunstein chapter choice situation choice value choosing claim collapsing principle comparative fact comparativism continuum contributory value aspects covering value David Wiggins Derek Parfit determinate failure entail equally Eunice evaluative difference example Fer than y friendship and money given hard high regard historical sensitivity holds imprecise cardinality Incommensurability incomparabilist incomparable with respect indeterminacy intrinsic intuitive items are incomparable James Griffin John Broome John Finnis Joseph Raz judgments justification of choice justified choice justifying reason matters merits money are incomparable monism moral notion organic account Pareto Argument parity philosophical talent plausible possible practical reason predicate rability rational choice Raz's regard for friendship relativized relevant requirement sorites Standard Model substantive supervalue Suppose tive Trichotomy Thesis true nor false truth unbiased differences understanding understood vague value relation worse x is Fer