A philosophical commentary on these words of the Gospel, Luke 14.23: "Compel them to come in, that My house may be full"
The topics of church and state, religious toleration, the legal enforcement of religious practices, and religiously motivated violence on the part of individuals have once again become burning issues. Pierre Bayle's Philosophical Commentarywas a major attempt to deal with very similar problems three centuries ago. His argument is that if the orthodox have the right and duty to persecute, then every sect will persecute, since every sect considers itself orthodox. The result will be mutual slaughter, something God cannot have intended. The Philosophical Commentarytakes its starting point from the words attributed to Jesus Christ in Luke 14:23, "And the lord said unto the servant, Go out into the highways and hedges, and compel them to come in, that my house may be full." Bayle contends that the word compel cannot mean "force." From this perspective, he constructs his doctrine of toleration based on the singular importance of conscience. His point is not that coercion usually is ineffective in matters of faith but that, even when effective, it is wrong because it ignores the indispensability of the free conscience. Bayle's book was translated into English in 1708. The Liberty Fund edition reprints that translation, carefully checked against the French and corrected, with an introduction and annotations designed to make Bayle's arguments accessible to the twenty-first-century reader. Pierre Bayle(1647-1706), Protestant philosopher and critic, was born in France. In 1675 he became professor of philosophy at Sedan until forced into exile in Rotterdam in 1681, where he published works on religion with a liberal and tolerant tendency. He was dismissed from his position at the Huguenot refugees academy in 1693 following the accusation that he was an agent of France and an enemy of Protestantism. In 1696 he completed his major work, the Dictionnaire historique et critique. John Kilcullenis a Senior Research Fellow in Humanities at Macquarie University in Sydney, Australia. Chandran Kukathasis Chair in Political Theory atThe London School of Economics and Political Science, University of London. Knud Haakonssenis Professor of Intellectual History and Director of the Centre for Intellectual History at the University of Sussex, England.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
The Preliminary Discourse
A Refutation of those who say that the Persecutions against Protestants do
10 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Action answer appear Argument Arians Austin Austin's words Author Bayle Bayle's believ'd believe Blasphemy Calvinists Catholicks Chapter Children Christians Church of Rome Command Commentary committed Compel condemn confute Conscience consequently Constraint Convertists convinc'd cou'd Crimes death Dispute Divine Doctrine Donatists Dragoons Edicts Emperor Error Evil example exercis'd Faith false Falshood Father force France give Gospel guilty Heresy Hereticks innocent Jesus Christ Jews Judges Judgment justly King Laws least ligion literal Sense Loeb Classical Library Love matter Maxims means Morality Murder natural never Objection oblig'd oblige Opinion ordain'd Orthodox Pagans Papists Party Patrologia Latina Persecution Persecutors Person persuaded Pierre Jurieu Power pretend Princes Principles Protestants prov'd publick punish'd Punishment Reason regard Religion reveal'd Right Rule Scripture Sect shew shou'd sincere Sins Socinian Sophism Soul Sovereign Spirit suppos'd suppose there's they'l thing thro Toleration Truth twas twere Violence wicked World wou'd