Behind Closed Doors: IRBs and the Making of Ethical Research
Although the subject of federally mandated Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) has been extensively debated, we actually do not know much about what takes place when they convene. The story of how IRBs work today is a story about their past as well as their present, and Behind Closed Doors is the first book to meld firsthand observations of IRB meetings with the history of how rules for the treatment of human subjects were formalized in the United States in the decades after World War II. Drawing on extensive archival sources, Laura Stark reconstructs the daily lives of scientists, lawyers, administrators, and research subjects working—and “warring”—on the campus of the National Institutes of Health, where they first wrote the rules for the treatment of human subjects. Stark argues that the model of group deliberation that gradually crystallized during this period reflected contemporary legal and medical conceptions of what it meant to be human, what political rights human subjects deserved, and which stakeholders were best suited to decide. She then explains how the historical contingencies that shaped rules for the treatment of human subjects in the postwar era guide decision making today—within hospitals, universities, health departments, and other institutions in the United States and across the globe. Meticulously researched and gracefully argued, Behind Closed Doors will be essential reading for sociologists and historians of science and medicine, as well as policy makers and IRB administrators.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
administrators American approval argued Beecher Belmont report Bethesda bioethics Board meeting minutes board members Carl Clinical Center leaders clinicians colleagues conscientious objectors consent forms created decisions declarative bodies deliberations disease doctors documents drug example explained federal funding Greenly group consideration group review healthy patients Himmelsbach hospital Human experimentation human subjects informed consent Institutional review Boards investigators IRB chair IrB meetings IrB members James Augustine shannon James shannon Kevin knowledge experts Ladimer Loc INtrA 2-1-A Masur Medical Board meeting medicine Mennonite Church UsA moral NArAII National Institutes NiH Clinical Center NIH leaders NiH researchers NiH’s Normal controls Normal Volunteer Nuremberg Code objectors odeF oNIHH practice prisoners problem procedure professional experience protect protocol PrPL recruiting regulations research ethics research participants research subjects review boards risks Rourke Rourke’s Sarah scientists shannon sick patients social surgeon Terry tion warrants World War II