Oxford University Press, 2005 - Medical - 176 pages
Today, advances in medicine and biotechnology occur at a rapid pace and have a profound impact on our lives. Mechanical devices can sustain an injured person's life indefinitely. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of the body and brain can reveal disorders before symptoms appear. Genetic testing of embryos can predict whether people will have diseases earlier or later in life. It may even become possible to clone human beings. These and other developments raise difficult ethical questions.
Biomedical Ethics is an engaging philosophical introduction to the most important ethical positions and arguments in six areas of biomedicine: the patient-doctor relationship, medical research on humans, reproductive rights and technologies, genetics, medical decisions at the end of life, and the allocation of scarce medical resources. Concisely capturing the historical, contemporary, and future-oriented aspects of the field, author Walter Glannon discusses both perennial issues in medicine, such as doctors' duties to patients, and recent and emerging issues in scientific innovation, including gene therapy and cloning. Ideal for undergraduate courses in contemporary moral problems, introduction to ethics, and introduction to bioethics, Biomedical Ethics is accessible to students who have little or no background in ethical theory, medicine, or biotechnology.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
The PatientDoctor Relationship
Medical Research on Humans
Reproductive Rights and Technologies
4 other sections not shown
abortion action allow argue argument autonomy become believe benefit better body brain capacity cause cells chapter child claim clinical trials cloning competent condition consent considered continue cultures death decision depend determine develop disabilities disease disorders distinction doctor drug duty effective embryos equal ethical example exist fact fair fetus functioning future gene genetic give given goals greater harm human idea important individuals interests intervention involves issues justified killing lead lives means medicine ment moral mutation objection obligation organ outcome pain parents participate patient permissible person physician positive potential practice prevent principle priority procedure prohibited protect question raise reason receive refuse reproductive respect responsibility result risk selection severe significant social status subjects suffering surrogate testing theories therapeutic therapy tion transplant treat treatment trials University women worse wrong