What Makes Us Moral?: Crossing the Boundaries of Biology
Oneworld, 2004 - Philosophy - 237 pages
Many people fear that science, in the form of genetics and evolutionaryiology, will show that everything we hold most dear is illusory or shameful.orality will prove to be disguised selfishness; our choices will be shown toe driven by instincts; our reasoning will prove to be constrained by ouriology. This book argues that these fears are groundless. Our morality, likeur emotions and our abilities, is indeed the product of evolution, but thisoes not make it illusory. Nor should we conclude, as so many psychologistsnd biologists have done, that our morality is reducible to our biologicalnstincts. Instead, properly understood, the evidence from the sciencesupports the view that the moral capacities we have are capable ofeassessing the very processes which gave birth to them, condemning theiological selfishness in which they had their origin. Human nature is aumane nature, at least in all the ways that matter, and understanding ourrigins ought to make us marvel at it all the more.
35 pages matching intelligence in this book
Results 1-3 of 35
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
The moral consequences of Darwinism
The evolution of morality
The Stone Age mind
5 other sections not shown
ability adaptation alter altruistic ancestors animals argue attractiveness Baron-Cohen bats believe better Big Kiku biologists biology Blank Slate brain Buss characteristics claims cognitive concerned cooperate culture Darwinian Dawkins defect defectors desires dispositions E. O. Wilson environment ethics eugenics evidence evolutionary explanations evolutionary psychology evolved example expect explain fact females fitness genes genetic determinism genome heritability human behavior human nature Huxley hypothesis Ibid implications important inclusive fitness inheritance innate intelligence kinds less live male mate Matt Ridley modules moral emotions motivated mutation natural selection naturalistic fallacy norm of reaction offspring organisms ourselves parents perhaps phenotypic philosophers Pinker player political population possess predict preference prisoner's dilemma product of evolution rape rational reproductive result Richard Dawkins seems selfish sexual Social Darwinism Social Darwinists social norms society sociobiology species SSSM strategy theory Thornhill and Palmer tion traits true Wason selection task women