Het onstaan van de kanon des Onden Verbonds

Front Cover
Luzac, 1895 - Bible - 182 pages
1 Review
I have tried to arrive at a tenable conception of the history of canonization, and have given particular attention to the causes and motives which were operative in it. It seemed to me desirable that a volume of moderate size should be published on the origin of the Canon of the Old Testament. I hope that it may prove to be a plain guide for students in their studies, and one that, at the same time, stimulates them to go further into the history of the origin of the books of the Bible. How closely both the external and the internal history of the Canon is connected with this, will be apparent at every step. - Author's preface to the first edition.

What people are saying - Write a review

User Review - Flag as inappropriate

Gerrit Wildeboer’s editor (and translator?), George Moore, remarks that this Canon is not merely a history, but a critical examination. Moore notes that the closest comparable work of the day was Frants Buhl’s Canon and Text of the Old Testament (http://books.google.com/books?id=pBFKAAAAMAAJ) and Herbert Edward Ryle’s Canon of the Old Testament (http://books.google.com/books?id=-LU8AAAAYAAJ).
Wildeboer, after stage-setting sections, summarized the historical evidences in these groupings: internal evidence, what was inside the Old Testament itself; Jewish and Greek literature; what is inside the New Testament; Palestinian Jewish sources, the Talmud particularly; and the Christian Church Fathers. After describing the concept of canonicity as presented in Jewish schools, Wildeboer then discussed the canonization, and closing of the canon, to the three general divisions: the Law, the Prophets, and the Writings.
Wildeboer, Gerrit. Canon of the Old Testament: An Historico-Critical Enquiry. Edited by George F. Moore. London: Luzac, 1895. http://books.google.com/ebooks/reader?id=JetJAAAAMAAJ.

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

Popular passages

Page 49 - That upon you may come all the righteous blood shed upon the earth, from the blood of righteous Abel unto the blood of Zacharias, son of Barachias, whom ye slew between the temple and the altar.
Page 82 - Hie prologus scripturarum quasi galeatum principium omnibus libris, quos de Hebraeo vertimus in Latinum, convenire potest : ut scire valeamus, quicquid extra hos est, inter apocrypha esse ponendum. Igitur Sapientia, quae vulgo Salomonis inscribitur, et Jesufilii Sirach liber, et Judith, et Tobias, et Pastor, non sunt in Canone. Macchabaeorum primum librum hebraicum reperi. Secundus graecus est, quod ex ipsa quoque phrasi probari potest.
Page 82 - Sanctus, Sanctus, Sanctus, Dominus Deus omnipotens, qui erat, et qui est, et qui venturus est.
Page 82 - Tertius ordo Hagiographa possidet. Et primus liber incipit a Job. Secundus a David, quem quinque incisionibus et uno Psalmorum volumine comprehendunt. Tertius est Solomon, tres libros habens, Proverbia, quae illi Misle, id est Parabolas appellant : Quartus Ecclesiastes, id est Coheleth.
Page 94 - All these things are the book of the covenant of the most high God, even the law which Moses commanded for an heritage unto the congregations of Jacob.
Page 82 - Octavus Esdras, qui et ipse similiter apud Graecos et Latinos in duos libros divisus est. Nonus Esther.
Page 80 - Viginti et duas litteras esse apud Hebraeos, Syrorum quoque et Chaldaeorum lingua testatur, quae Hebraeae magna ex parte confinis est : nam et ipsi viginti duo elementa habent eodem sono, sed diversis characteribus, Samaritani etiam Pentateuchum Mosi totidem litteris scriptitant, figuris tantum et apicibus discrepantes. Certumque est Esdram...
Page 81 - Jeremias cum Cinoth, id est, Lamentationibus suis. Quomodo igitur viginti duo elementa sunt, per quae scribimus Hebraice omne quod loquimur, et eorum initiis vox humana comprehenditur : ita viginti duo volumina supputantur, quibus, quasi litteris et exordiis, in Dei doctrina, tenera adhuc et lactens viri justi eruditur infantia. Primus apud eos liber vocatur Bresith quem nos Genesim dicimus.
Page 165 - Wildeboer (p. 165) concludes his dissertation by what seems like a claim of orthodox endorsement of the modern critical theory of the canon : " As long ago as the beginning of the eighteenth century, a learned and pious German theologian, and a champion of orthodoxy too, wrote these true words : ' Canon non uno, quod dicunt, actu ab hominibus, sed paulatim a Deo, animorum temporumque rectore, productus est.
Page 84 - Aiunt Hebraei, quum inter cetera scripta Salomonis quae antiquata sunt nee in memoria duraverunt et hie liber oblitterandus videretur, eo quod vanas Dei assereret creaturas et totum putaret esse pro nihilo et cibum et potum et • delicias transeuntes praeferret omnibus, ex hoc uno capitulo nicruisse auctoritatem ut in divinorum voluminum numero poneretur...

Bibliographic information