When War Is Unjust: Being Honest in Just-War Thinking
Can any war really be considered "just"? If so, which wars, and under what circumstances? If not, why not? When War Is Unjust provides a systematic exploration of these questions for students of ethics, Christian doctrine, and history. For centuries the just-war tradition has been the dominant framework for Christian thinking about organized conflict. This tradition sets a number of specific conditions which must be satisfied before a particular war can termed "just" and therefore supportable by the faithful Christian. John Howard Yoder, himself a pacifist, approaches the just-war theory on its own terms. His purpose: to introduce the student to this just-war tradition, and to offer a critical framework for evaluating its tenets and applying them to real conflicts. When War Is Unjust takes the just-war tradition seriously, and holds its proponents accountable in a critical debate about when - if ever - war can be justified. It is a readable and thought-provoking primer on the history, criteria, and application of just-war teaching in Christian churches. Study guides and a bibliography, as well as helpful responses from Charles Lutz (Lutheran) and Drew Christiansen (Roman Catholic) make this an ideal text for undergraduate ethics courses, peace studies, and individuals interested in exploring the meaning and application of just-war theory.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Introduction by Charles P Lutz
The JustWar Tradition in Its Medieval Context
Hopes for Limiting War
3 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
When War Is Unjust, Second Edition: Being Honest in Just-War Thinking
John Howard Yoder
Limited preview - 2001
American apply argue argument authority cause Chapter Christian church citizen claim clear combat committed conflict conscientious credibility criticism crusade debate decision defend destruction doctrine double effect draft enemy escalation evil fight force Francis Lieber Francisco de Vitoria holy immunity intrinsically John Courtney Murray John Howard Yoder jus in bello just-war criteria just-war ethic just-war tradition just/unjust-war justifiable justifiable-war killing last resort legitimate limit logic Lutheran Lutz means medieval ment Middle Ages Military necessity modern moral national-interest nations never noncombatant nonpacifist nonviolent nuclear numbers Nuremberg objectors obligation one's pacifism pacifist Paul Ramsey peace political position possibility prince proportionality prosecution Protestant Reformation question reasoning religious respect responsibility restraint revolution Roland Bainton Roman Catholic rulers rules selective objection soldiers specific Stephen King-Hall strategy surrender Telford Taylor theologians theory thinkers tion tional treaty unjust valid Vietnam violence warfare wars weapons wrong