Feminine Discourse in Roman Comedy: On Echoes and Voices
As literature written in Latin has almost no female authors, we are dependent on male writers for some understanding of the way women would have spoken. Plautus (3rd to 2nd century BCE) and Terence (2nd century BCE) consistently write particular linguistic features into the lines spoken by their female characters: endearments, soft speech, and incoherent focus on numerous small problems. Dorota M. Dutsch describes the construction of this feminine idiom and asks whether it should be considered as evidence of how Roman women actually spoke.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
actors Alcumena amabo Ampelisca Amphitruo appears Aristophanes Aristotle Aristotle’s atque audience Aulularia bacchae Bacchanalia Bacchides blanda blanditia body boundaries Casina Chapter ch˘ra Cicero Cist Cleustrata comic conversation denote described discussion dolor Donatus endearment Ennius Epid example exchange expressions father female characters female speech feminine discourses feminine speech gender girls Greek Hecyra husband ibid imitate Irigaray Irigaray’s jokes Konstan lament language language-games Latin linguistic Livy Livy’s lover Lysidamus Lysiteles male and female male characters man’s masculine matrons Menaechmus Menander Menander’s meretrix mi/mea mihi miser mother mulier Myrrhina neque numbers nunc Odysseus pain Palaestra perceptions personae pimp Plato’s Plautine Plautus play playwrights Plutarch Poen Poenulus prostitute Pseudolus quam quid Quintilian quod references role Roman comedy Rudens scene scholia scripts sexual sister slave Sostrata speaker speaking stage style Terence’s texts theatre theatrical tibi tion Tiriolo voice weeping woman women words