Capital Punishment: A Balanced Examination
Capital Punishment: a Balanced Examination, is a balanced and comprehensive overview of capital punishment. It also probes the constitutional implications of its implementation in America, and ponders some of the hard questions concerning its applications, such as how long capital appeals take. Mandery's examination of capital punishment requires the reader to think about some basic philosophical questions, such as would you ever kill? Each chapter begins with a primer of the issue at hand, followed by the data and critical documents necessary to make an educated assessment, and ending with essays offering differing viewpoints by some of the best minds in the country, including Stephen Nathanson, Hugo Adam Bedau, Michael Radelet, Scott Turow, Carol and Jordan Steiker, and Franklin Zimring.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Moral Arguments About the Death Penalty
The Death Penalty as Applied in America
The Mentally Retarded
Victim Impact Evidence
Habeas Corpus and the Role of Innocence
Rape and Proportionality
Other editions - View all
actually aggravating American appeal arbitrariness argue argument authority basis believe capital punishment cause circumstances claim committed concerns conclusion consider consideration constitutional convicted costs crime criminal dangerousness death penalty death row death sentence decision defendant defendant's deserve determine deterrent effect Eighth Amendment error evidence execution fact factors fair federal felony final Furman future Georgia given guilt homicide human impact important imposed imposition individual inmates innocent involved issue judge judgment jurors jury Justice kill least less limited majority mentally retarded mitigating moral murder offenders offered opinion particular person petitioner possible practice present prison problem procedural question rape reason relevant response result retarded risk rule serve severe significant society standards statute suggest Supreme Court Texas tion trial United victim violate