Jury Nullification: The Evolution of a Doctrine

Front Cover
Carolina Academic Press, 1998 - Law - 311 pages
1 Review
Central to the history of trial by jury is the right of jurors to vote "not guilty" if the law is unjust or unjustly applied. When jurors acquit a factually guilty defendant, we say that the jury "nullified" the law. The Founding Fathers believed that juries in criminal trials had a role to play as the "conscience of the community," & relied on juries' "nullifying" to hold the government to the principles of the Constitution. Yet over the last century & a half, this power of jurors has been derided & ignored by American courts, to the point that today few jurors are aware that an important part of their role is, in the words of the Supreme Court, to "prevent oppression by the government."

From inside the book

What people are saying - Write a review

LibraryThing Review

User Review  - dono421846 - LibraryThing

Nigh exhaustive treatment (perhaps even too exhaustive, it could be argued). The last chapter offering advice on lawyer's courtroom techniques to obtain a nullification verdict seemed very out of ... Read full review


Chapter One Introduction
United States 283 U S 10th Cir 1990 269
Chapter Two The Origins of the Doctrine

31 other sections not shown

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

Bibliographic information