Spatial Prepositions: A Case Study from French

Front Cover
University of Chicago Press, Oct 8, 1991 - Language Study - 265 pages
This striking study of the meaning and use of the major spatial prepositions in French provides valuable insight into how the human mind organizes spatial relationships.

Most previous analyses of spatial prepositions have assumed that their semantic properties can be adequately explained by familiar logical and geometrical concepts. Thus, the standard view of the preposition "in" as it appears in the sentence "the ball is in the bag" postulates that it refers to the geometrical relation of inclusion. This paradigm, however, falters when faced with the contrast in acceptability between sentences such as "the bulb is in the socket" and "the bottle is in the cap." The force exerted by the "landmark" (a conceptually fixed object) on the "target" (a moveable object) is crucial in this difference: the functional notion of containment seems more operational in the use of the preposition "in" than inclusion. That is, what are taken to be the landmark and the target depend greatly on the functions these objects serve in the human scheme. This offers important clues to otherwise problematic linguistic quirks, such as why one sleeps in one's bed, while one is said to lie on one's deathbed.

While many of the examples apply in English as well as French, there are some noteworthy differences—in French one sits on a chair, but in a couch. Vandeloise convincingly argues that it is precisely this subjective element which makes a standard geometrical account unfeasible.
 

Contents

Beyond geometric and logical descriptions of space A functional description
3
The logical description of spatial prepositions
9
A functional description of spatial prepositions
13
The asymmetry of spatial relations
21
The relation of landmark and speaker
24
Directional and functional prepositions
29
The representation of objects
32
Intrinsic orientation of objects
35
The second usage rule of the prepositions devantderrière
125
The impetus of the prepositions devantderrière
132
The prepositions avantaprès and order in potential encounter
134
The prepositions avantaprès and order along a scale
135
The prepositions avantaprès and relative movement
138
Potential encounter
148
The expressions en avanten arrière
150
The distributions of avantaprès and devantderrière
152

The contextual orientation of objects
38
Concepts involved in the description of spatial prepositions
43
Prepositional use
46
Complex primitives and language acquisition
54
Pragmatic bridges and language acquisition
61
Review
63
SPATIAL PREPOSITIONS
65
The expressions près deloin de and accessibility
67
Accessibility and the norm
68
The description of the expressions près deloin de
70
A comparison of the expressions près deproche de
72
Positions on the vertical axis
74
The expressions audessus deen dessous de
80
The prepositions devantderrière and general orientation
89
The prepositions devantderrière and general orientation
92
The prepositional terms of the relations devantderrière
101
The expressions en face dedans le dos de and frontal direction
104
The expressions à gaucheà droite and lateral orientation
109
The advantages of lateral orientation over lateral direction
112
La gauchela droite
117
The prepositional terms of à gaucheà droite
118
The prepositions devantderrière and access to perception
122
A unified description of the English expressions in front ofin back of
123
The preposition à and localization
157
The preposition à and localization
160
The preposition à and integrated landmarks
173
Conclusions
184
The prepositions sursous and the bearerburden relation
186
The bearerburden relation and the impetus of the prepositions sursous
194
The development of sous based on its impetus
197
Comparison of the prepositions à and sur
199
Comparison of the prepositions centre and sur
204
The relation between the prepositions derrière and sous
207
The prepositions danshors de and the containercontained relation
210
Topological relations between the objects of the prepositions danshors de
211
Total inclusion and partial inclusion
215
The expression hors de and movement
220
The containercontained relation
222
A comparison of the prepositions dans sur and sous
228
The expression en dedansen dehors
233
CONCLUSIONS
235
NOTES
239
REFERENCES
249
INDEX
255
Copyright

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

About the author (1991)

Claude Vandeloise is associate professor in the Departments of French and Italian at Louisiana State University.

Bibliographic information