Michigan Reports: Cases Decided in the Supreme Court of Michigan, Volume 17
Michigan. Supreme Court, Harry Burns Hutchins, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, William Jennison, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, John Adams Brooks, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, James M. Reasoner, Henry Allen Chaney, Richard W. Cooper, William Dudley Fuller, Van Buren Denslow, Marquis B. Eaton, John L. Stoddard, Herschel Bouton Lazell, Edward Gott (A.), Marshall Davis Ewell, Edgar Arthur Cooley, Russell Cowles Ostrander
Phelphs & Stevens, printers, 1869 - Law reports, digests, etc
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
admissible admitted affidavit agreement alleged amount Ann Arbor appears assignment assumpsit attornment Auditor Barb bill Caplis cause of action charge Christiancy Circuit Court Circuit Judge City of Detroit claim Commissioner common counts common law complainant constitution contract Cooley Ch counsel County court of equity damages declaration deed defendant in error defendant's district entitled equity evidence execution facts fence filed ground held Henry H Homoeopathy injunction intended issue judgment jury jury fees Justices concurred lands legislature levy lien lumber mandamus ment Michigan misjoinder mortgage negligence notice objection offered Oliver Johnson opinion paid parol parties payment person plaintiff in error possession premises proceedings proof prove purchase purpose question reasonable record recover refused Regents rendered replevin rule specific taxes statute suit Swinscoe tenant tending to show testimony tion township trial verdict void Wayne witness writ
Page 77 - All specific State taxes, except those received from the mining companies of the Upper Peninsula, shall be applied in paying the interest upon the primary school, university, and other educational funds, and the interest and principal of the State debt, in the order herein recited, until the extinguishment of the State debt, other than the amounts due to educational funds, when such specific taxes shall be added to, and constitute a part of the primary school interest fund.
Page 178 - The board of regents shall have the general supervision of the University, and the direction and control of all expenditures from the University interest fund.
Page 21 - when a person of sound memory and discretion unlawfully killeth any reasonable creature in being, and under the king's peace, with malice aforethought, either express or implied.
Page 19 - The counsel for the defendant requested the court to charge the jury that if they believed...
Page 120 - The case, however, must be a very clear one which would justify the court in taking upon itself this responsibility. For when the judge decides that a want of due care is not shown, he necessarily fixes in his own mind the standard of ordinary prudence, and measuring the plaintiff's conduct by that, turns him out of court upon his opinion of what a reasonably prudent man ought to have done under the circumstances.
Page 87 - The taxing power of a state is one of its attributes of sovereignty. And where there has been no compact with WALCOTT v. TRE PEOFLE. the federal government, or cession of jurisdiction, for the purposes specified in the constitution, this power reaches all the property and business within the state, which are not properly denominated the means of the general government, and.
Page 201 - ... to testify at all to matters which, if true, must have been equally within the knowledge of such deceased person...
Page 80 - SEC. 10. The State may continue to collect all specific taxes accruing to the treasury under existing laws. The Legislature may provide for the collection of specific taxes, from banking, railroad, plank-road, and other corporations hereafter created.
Page 123 - ... conclusions has been drawn by the jury. The inferences to be drawn from the evidence must either be certain and incontrovertible, or they cannot be decided upon by the court. Negligence cannot be conclusively established by a state of facts upon which fair-minded men may well differ.