When in the Course of Human Events: Arguing the Case for Southern Secession
Using primary documents from both foreign and domestic observers, prominent scholar Charles Adams makes a powerful and convincing case that the Southern states were legitimately exercising their political rights as expressed in the Declaration of Independence when they seceded from the United States. Although conventional histories have taught generations of Americans that this was a war fought for lofty moral principles, Adams' eloquent history transcends simple Southern partisanship to show how the American Civil War was primarily a battle over competing commercial interests, opposing interpretations of constitutional rights, and what English novelist Charles Dickens described as a fiscal quarrel.
What people are saying - Write a review
The Ku Klux Klan
3 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
abolitionists Alexander Stephens armies arms arrest battle blacks British cabinet called cause century Charles Dickens Chief Justice citizens civilian coln commander commerce condemned Confederacy Confederate Congress Constitution crime Declaration defeated democracy democratic economic editorial emancipation Emancipation Proclamation empire European ex-slaves fighting Figure flag force Gettysburg habeas corpus Haiti hatred historians Ibid imprisoned inaugural invade issue Jefferson Davis justify Klan lawyer leaders liberty Lieber Code Lincoln Magazine Mary Surratt Maryland merchants military Mill Morrill Tariff nation negroes newspapers Northern peace political ports preserving the Union president prison Proclamation reason rebel rebellion Republican revenue Robert Toombs Roman rule secede secession secessionist Sherman slaughter slavery society soldiers Southern Sumter Supreme Court suspend Taney tariff taxes tion trade traitors trial tribunal troops U.S. Constitution Union armies United Vallandigham Virginia wanted Washington white supremacy wrote Yankee York