Chain Reaction: Expert Debate and Public Participation in American Commercial Nuclear Power 1945-1975Chain Reaction seeks to explain how and why America came to depend so heavily on its experts after World War II, how those experts translated that authority into political clout, and why that authority and political discretion declined in the 1970s. Brian Balogh's pathbreaking research into the internal memoranda of the Atomic Energy Commission substantiates his arguments in impressive historical detail. |
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
professionalization and politics in twentiethcentury America | 1 |
nuclear experts and national politics 19451947 | 21 |
the politics of verisimilitude | 60 |
the Atomic Energy Commissions first decade of commercialization | 95 |
reactor safety 19471960 | 120 |
The magnetic pull of professional disciplines issue networks and local government | 149 |
mainstreaming expertise 19571970 | 171 |
the challenge to nuclear power 19601975 | 221 |
page xi | 238 |
95 | 247 |
120 | 254 |
149 | 261 |
171 | 266 |
327 | 276 |
Other editions - View all
Chain Reaction: Expert Debate and Public Participation in American ... Brian Balogh No preview available - 1993 |
Common terms and phrases
ACRS administrative Advisory Committee AEC's agency American applications Atomic Energy Commission authority Boston chair challenge civilian Committee on Atomic competitive concern Congress construction continued cost criticism debate December decision demand demonstration director discussion early economic effort Electric engineering environmental established expertise experts federal field Files folder funds Health hearings Ibid important increased industry instance interest issue January JCAE John Joint Committee legislation Lilienthal March matter McMahon meeting military Minutes noted nuclear power October Office operating organization participation plant pointed political position potential practical president Press pressure Price problems produce professional proposed questions reactor reactor development Reactor Safeguards reason Regulatory response role safety Science scientific scientists Seaborg Senator siting social sought Special Staff statement Strauss technical United University utilities Wolman World York