Founding a Balkan State: Albania's Experiment with Democracy, 1920-1925

Front Cover
University of Toronto Press, 2012 - History - 222 pages

Founding a Balkan State examines the pivotal period in Albanian history when the country's fundamental goals and directions were most hotly contested. In 1920, liberal Albanian leaders – led by the US-educated Bishop Fan S. Noli – began working to introduce democracy to the country, hoping that it would lead to modernization, prosperity, and overturning the legacy of five hundred years of Ottoman rule. In 1924, these leaders mounted a successful revolution; by 1925, however, their forces were in retreat. Albania soon slid into dictatorship under Ahmed Bey Zogu – first as president, then as self-proclaimed king.

Founding a Balkan State provides the only comprehensive assessment in English of these events. Robert C. Austin first delves into the country's weak domestic and international position both before and after the First World War, then assesses the internal and external challenges posed to its state- and nation-building efforts. Austin shrewdly demonstrates how the missed opportunities of Albania's political transition affected the course of Balkan history for decades to come.

 

What people are saying - Write a review

User Review - Flag as inappropriate

This volume, a reworking of Robert Austin’s dissertation, is a welcome addition to the growing literature in English on the history of Albania. This work in particular deals with a neglected moment in the historiography of Albania, the “democratic” moment of June-December of 1924. The author contextualizes this “revolution”, frequently referred to as the June Revolution or the Democratic Revolution, of Theofan (Fan) Noli and his subsequent struggle to bring stability and legitimation to his seizure of power. Moreover, Austin provides the precursors to the events of June of 1924 as well as regional and international reaction after the events in question.
In part, this work tells the story of the struggle between Ahmed Zogu and Theofan Noli and their competing visions of what Albania should be. While the work focuses on Noli it does develop a picture of Zogu as well. In many ways, the first two chapters describe the interaction between the Zogu and Noli factions before the “revolution.” Even after Noli’s seizure of power, Zogu frequently appears as a challenge to his legitimacy.
Aside from simply developing a concrete narrative of events, Austin problematizes the idea of Fan Noli’s seizure of power as a true revolution. Instead, he categorizes it as a coup d’état and fleshes out the reasons for this assertion. Along with this, the author illuminates the internal politics of 1920’s Albania very effectively. Moreover, this work illustrates that what Albania was to become and how it would be governed was an ongoing process long after the declaration of independence and the end of the First World War.
After the antecedents of the “revolution” and Noli’s seizure of power are laid out, the struggle for international recognition and the unwillingness of Noli to call fresh elections are carefully described. In the subsequent chapters, Austin describes Noli’s faith in the League of Nations and the British to maintain his hold on power and the struggle with Greece and Yugoslavia on border modifications. Latter, attempts to get recognition from the United States, Italy, and finally the Soviet Union are discussed in detail.
Along with the narrative and analysis of Noli’s regime and its relations with Albania and the region, this work also offers engaging subtexts. The scramble for oil concessions by the British and Americans as well as the negotiations on the part of the Noli regime with the Soviet Union offers an interesting backdrop to Noli’s drive for international recognition.
As a final point, Austin illustrates the collapse of the “democratic experiment”. After Noli alienated Albanian and foreign allies, Zogu, Noli’s erstwhile adversary, returned in force with Albanian and Yugoslav assistance and an army of White Russian freebooters. Thus, the June Revolution was destroyed by the forces of reaction, i.e. Zogu and Muslim landowners, and foreign intervention, but also by Noli’s own intransigence, ineptitude, and lack of political acumen as well as the indifference of Noli’s Western “allies.”
A great strength of this work is that it offers a corrective to much of the Albanian nationalist literature on this topic from the communist and post-communist eras. Austin engages and references this literature directly and effectively proposes counter narratives. Several pre-existing assumptions are challenged and in some cases bluntly refuted. In order to buttress these arguments and the narrative, an impressive amount of sources were consulted. The National Archive of Albania in Tirana (A.Q.SH) and a significant amount of printed material from the League of Nations, the British Foreign Office, and the U.S. State Department as well as the personal papers of many contemporary Albanian politicians are utilized. Effective use is also made of periodical literature from the period
One critique of the work is that it provides only one map, which is rather small and doesn’t provide much detail. The author makes frequent reference to various cities within Albania as well as within the
 

Contents

Internal and External Challenges
3
Creating a Revolutionary Situation
28
Notes
165
Bibliography
205
Copyright

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

About the author (2012)

Robert C. Austin is a senior lecturer in the Centre for European, Russian, and Eurasian Studies at the Munk School of Global Affairs at the University of Toronto.

Bibliographic information