Language Policy & Identity In The U.S.
Well over thirty million people in the United States speak a primary language other than English. Nearly twenty million of them speak Spanish. And these numbers are growing. Critics of immigration and multiculturalism argue that recent government language policies such as bilingual education, non-English election materials, and social service and workplace "language rights" threaten the national character of the United States. Proponents of bilingualism, on the other hand, maintain that, far from being a threat, these language policies and programs provide an opportunity to right old wrongs and make the United States a more democratic society.
This book lays out the two approaches to language policy -- linguistic assimilation and linguistic pluralism -- in clear and accessible terms. Filled with examples and narratives, it provides a readable overview of the U.S. "culture wars" and explains why the conflict has just now emerged as a major issue in the United States.
Professor Schmidt examines bilingual education in the public schools, "linguistic access" rights to public services, and the designation of English as the United States' "official" language. He illuminates the conflict by describing the comparative, theoretical, and social contexts for the debate. The source of the disagreement, he maintains, is not a disagreement over language per se but over identity and the consequences of identity for individuals, ethnic groups, and the country as a whole. Who are "the American people"? Are we one national group into which newcomers must assimilate? Or are we composed of many cultural communities, each of which is a unique but integral part of the national fabric? This fundamental point is what underlies the specific disputes over language policy. This way of looking at identity politics, as Professor Schmidt shows, calls into question the dichotomy between "material interest" politics and "symbolic" politics in relation to group identities.
Not limited to describing the nature and context of the language debate, Language Policy and Identity Politics in the United States reaches the conclusion that a policy of linguistic pluralism, coupled with an immigrant settlement policy and egalitarian economic reforms, will best meet the aims of justice and the common good. Only by attacking both the symbolic and material effects of racialization will the United States be able to attain the goals of social equality and national harmony.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
activists African Americans Anglo argue argument Asian Asian Americans assimilation assimilationists Chapter Civil Rights conflict over language contemporary context Court cultural communities discrimination economic employees English language English-only English-speaking ethnic groups ethnolinguistic ethnolinguistic groups example federal goal greater guage policy guistic Hispanic identity politics immigrants important individuals inequality issue justice Kymlicka language groups language minority language minority groups language policy conflict language policy debate language rights language shift languages and cultures Latino leaders learn English linguistic linguistic access linguistic pluralism linguistic pluralists Mexican American minority language monolingual multicultural multilingual national origin national unity Native American non-English languages non-English-speakers official English official language percent pluralistic integration pluralistic language policy public policy Puerto Rican Quebecois racialized ethnic requires Rights Act social equality Spanish status subordinate tion U.S. English U.S. history U.S. language policy U.S. society U.S. Supreme Court understanding United Voting Rights Act