A caring jurisprudence: listening to patients at the Supreme Court
This book argues that it is both possible and proper to develop a jurisprudence capable of incorporating the knowledge of patients. Drawing on feminist scholarship, this book proposes a model for a caring jurisprudence that integrates the ethic of justice and the ethic of care to ensure that patients' knowledge is included in judicial decision making.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
The Merging of Medical and Legal Knowledge
The Triumph of Medical
Enabling the Court to Hear
3 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
A Caring Jurisprudence: Listening to Patients at the Supreme Court
Susan M. Behuniak
Limited preview - 1999
abor abortion decision abortion law abortion right American amicus briefs applied argued assisted suicide Blackmun briefs filed caring jurisprudence Casey challenge claim clinic concerns constitutional rights context Cruzan cultural death doctors emotional knowledge epistemologies ethic of justice euthanasia experiences expertise fact Family Members feminist fetal fetus focus gender Gilligan's Glucksberg and Quill Hippocratic oath ibid ical impartial individual integrate involved judicial decision knowl knowledge of patients Lady Justice legal abortion legal knowledge legal norms litigants lives loved medical issue medical knowledge medical practice medical profession medicine moral offered opinion oral arguments pain particular party briefs perspective physicians Planned Parenthood political pregnancy pro-choice pro-PAS protection question relationship require respond restrictions Roe's role rules Sandra Day O'Connor scientific social statutes stories strict scrutiny suffering terminally ill patients tients tion treatment trimester U.S. Supreme Court unwanted pregnancy voice woman women women's rights