What people are saying - Write a review
This book is a must-read (or at least -skim) for any serious student of the period. The critical consensus of the "Drab Age," as Lewis calls it, of the 16th century has since changed somewhat, but it's still my sense that all new scholarship defending the aesthetics of the period are basically defending against Lewis's charge. That is to say, Lewis's shadow still falls heavily on contemporary scholarship.
As for non-graduate students, there is no other book comparable to this. You could read James Simpson's updated Cambridge guide to the period, but I can't imagine anyone outside of the academy finding much enjoyment there. Additionally, Simpson wrote his book with his (perfectly convincing) academic arguments at the forefront of his mind whereas Lewis sought out as his main objective a survey of the period. The result is that Lewis's construal of the period is truly plenary as over against Simpson's limited focus on the texts most interesting to him. Further, I really like the fact that Lewis wrote this book before it became unfashionable for critics to pass judgment on what, to me, is the central question for a literary mind: is the poem in question actually enjoyable?
This book, then, is a full-blooded entry into a period by one not possessed only of a great mind but a great heart. Oh, and you also get a professional analysis of the history of ideas through which the late medieval/early Renaissance mind was passing at no extra charge.
Review: English Literature in the Sixteenth Century: Excluding Drama (Oxford History of English Literature Series)User Review - Jed - Goodreads
Lewis as scholar (as distinct from the much more modest Lewis as apologist) is intimidating, even when one is a Masters English Student (whatever that in fact means). In any case, Lewis' judgements ... Read full review
THE CLOSE OF THE MIDDLE AGES IN ENGLAND
RELIGIOUS CONTROVERSY AND TRANSLATION
9 other sections not shown