Delving into the anarchist writings of Nietzsche, Foucault, and Baudrillard, and exploring the cyberpunk fiction of William Gibson and Bruce Sterling, theorist Lewis Call examines the new philosophical current where anarchism meets postmodernism. This theoretical stream moves beyond anarchism's conventional attacks on capital and the state to criticize those forms of rationality, consciousness, and language that implicitly underwrite all economic and political power. Call argues that postmodernism's timely influence updates anarchism, making it relevant to the political culture of the new millennium.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
agenda anar anarchist politics anarchy of becoming argue articulate Bakunin Bataille Bookchin bourgeois political economy Bruce Sterling capital Cartesian challenge chism Chomsky classical anarchism concept conventional critical critique crucial culture cybernetic cyberpunk cyborg Debord Deleuze and Guattari Derrida developed Discipline and Punish discourse dominant Enlightenment Enlightenment's epistemological fascism feminists forms Foucault Foucaultian genealogy Gibson gift Gilles Deleuze Habermas humanist hyperreal Ibid Idoru implications Irigaray Jean Baudrillard Keyser Soze kind Kropotkin Lacan language liberal logos Marxism Mauss metaphysics micropolitics Murray Bookchin Neuromancer Nietzsche Nietzsche's thinking Nietzsche's thought Nietzschean nineteenth-century nomadic nomos perhaps philosophy political theory possible postindustrial postmodern anarchism postmodern anarchist problem radical politics rationalist rationality represents resistance revolution revolutionary Rorty semiotic sexuality simulation Situationist International social society space statist Sterling Sterling's strand strategy structure subversive suggests Symbolic Exchange terrain theoretical Thousand Plateaus tion transgression twentieth-century University usual suspects
Page 1 - If this is so, the entire history of the concept of structure, before the rupture of which we are speaking, must be thought of as a series of substitutions of center for center, as a linked chain of determinations of the center. Successively, and in a regulated fashion, the center receives different forms or names. The history of metaphysics, like the history of the West, is the history of these metaphors and metonymies.