1 page matching UNFAIR Frequency in this book
Results 1-1 of 1
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
29 Average 35 Average 36 Average adequate Appendix area businesses attraction efforts AVAILABLE AVAILABLE AVAILABLE UNAVAILABLE Frequency Brown County capital Community Business Retention competitors Computer-aided design concerns Corporation crime and vandalism curriculum Electrical Electronics existing expansion and retention EXPENSIVE VERY EXPENSIVE FACILITIES Frequency FAIR FAIR UNFAIR FAIR POOR Frequency felt firms report growth hazardous waste High School IDOC PROGRAMS impact Indiana Department Indiana University industrial recruitment labor costs labor/management relationship Lake Monroe market share Monroe County multiple responses allowed NON-COMPETITIVE Frequency Oliver Winery Partners in Community Percent planning previously surveyed product life cycle Rate the access Rate the adequacy rate the availability rate the cost Rate the quality raw material reportedly respondent firms respondent manufacturers Retention and Expansion SIGNIFICANT skills substance abuse surveyed businesses surveyed communities surveyed manufacturers Total response UNCOMPETITIVE UNFAIR Frequency UNFAIR VERY UNFAIR Union utilized versus waste disposal workers YES NO Frequency