Law, Liberty, and Psychiatry: An Inquiry Into the Social Uses of Mental Health Practices
"This present book has two major aims: first, to present a critical inquiry into the current social, and especially legal, uses of psychiatry; second, to offer a reasoned dissent from what I consider the theory and practice of false psychiatric liberalism. Most of the legal and social applications of psychiatry, undertaken in the name of psychiatric liberalism, are actually instances of despotism. To be sure, this type of despotism is based on health values, but it is despotism nonetheless. Why? Because the promoters of mental health do not eschew coercive methods but, on the contrary, eagerly embrace them. Just as in democracy there lurks the danger of tyranny by the majority, so in mental-health legislation there lurks the danger of tyranny by therapy. The book is addressed not only to lawyers, psychiatrists, and social scientists but also to the intelligent layman. Indeed, the last may find it especially useful, for organized psychiatry poses a much graver threat to him than it does to the professionals. Like any knowledge, psychiatric knowledge may be made to serve almost any cause. I shall try to show that today psychiatry in the United States is all too often used to subvert traditional political guarantees of individual liberty"--Preface. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
What Is Mental Illness?
Disease or Derogation?
Classification in Psychiatry
Commitment of the Mentally 111
Psychiatric Power and Social Action
The Abridgment of the Constitutional Rights
Toward the Therapeutic State
Proposals for Reform in the Mental Health Field
Summary and Conclusions
Other editions - View all
accused action American Bazelon behavior believe called Chapter civil commitment concept conduct considered constitutional court crime criminal law criminal responsibility criminally insane dangerous defendant defined deprived diagnosis Durham Durham rule Elizabeths Hospital ethical example experts Ezra Pound fact Fascism forensic forensic psychiatry freedom Freud function guilty habeas corpus Hence hospitalized mental patient human imprisonment incarcerated individual insanity plea issue italics added judge jury justify kill Kowalski liberty M'Naghten M'Naghten rule ment mental disease mental health mental hospital mental illness mentally sick moral Negro nosology offender opinion Overholser Perhaps person physicians political Pound practice prison problem procedure protection psychia psychiatric hospital psychiatric treatment psychiatrists psychoanalytic psychotherapy punishment question reason of insanity release role rules schizophrenia sentence situation Sixth Amendment so-called mentally ill social society stand trial status Szasz testamentary capacity testify therapeutic therapy tion treated tried violated