Philosophy of Science: A Contemporary Introduction

Front Cover
Psychology Press, 2005 - Science - 213 pages
1 Review
Reviews aren't verified, but Google checks for and removes fake content when it's identified
Alex Rosenberg includes new material on a number of subjects, including: * the theory of natural selection * Popper, Lakatos and Leibniz * feminist philosophy of science * logical positivism * the origins of science In addition, helpful features add greatly to ease and clarity of this second edition: * overviews and chapter summaries * study questions and annotated further reading * a helpful glossary explaining key words and concepts ture, methods and justification.
 

What people are saying - Write a review

We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.

Contents

II
1
IV
2
V
6
VI
8
VII
13
VIII
18
IX
19
X
21
XXXIII
107
XXXIV
109
XXXV
112
XXXVII
113
XXXVIII
116
XXXIX
120
XL
125
XLI
138

XII
22
XIII
25
XIV
33
XV
37
XVI
44
XVII
45
XIX
48
XXI
49
XXII
56
XXIII
61
XXIV
66
XXV
67
XXVI
69
XXVIII
70
XXIX
80
XXX
84
XXXI
97
XXXII
103
XLII
140
XLIII
142
XLIV
145
XLVI
146
XLVII
156
XLVIII
163
XLIX
167
L
168
LI
169
LII
170
LIII
179
LIV
184
LV
191
LVI
192
LVII
194
LVIII
202
LIX
206
Copyright

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

Popular passages

Page 113 - Anschauung), a sort of perception that would enable it to perceive essences. Substantial Forms, or whatever. But there is no such faculty. "Nothing is in the mind that was not first in the senses except the mind itself", as Kant put it, quoting Leibnitz.
Page 40 - LAWS 39 3 Ms R. voted for the left-of-center candidate in the latest election. But clearly the argument form of this explanation is not deductive. The truth of the premises does not guarantee the truth of the conclusion: they are compatible with the women in question not voting at all, or voting for the right-of-center candidate, etc. Statistical explanations on this view are inductive arguments - that is, they give good grounds for their conclusions without guaranteeing them, as deductive arguments...
Page 55 - ... syntax, which constitute the structure of the conceptual systems. Although the conceptual systems are logically entirely arbitrary, they are bound by the aim to permit the most nearly possible certain (intuitive) and complete co-ordination with the totality of sense-experiences; secondly they aim at greatest possible sparsity of their logically independent elements (basic concepts and axioms), ie, undefined concepts and underived [postulated] propositions.
Page 9 - Origin of man now proved. Metaphysics must flourish. He who understands baboon would do more toward metaphysics than Locke.
Page 78 - Pisa, rolling them down inclined planes, timing the period of péndula as their lengths are changed, all contributed to his discovery of the laws of motion of objects in the immediate vicinity of the Earth: projectiles always follow the paths of parabolas, the period of a pendulum (the time for one cycle of back and forth motion) depends on the length of the wire and never the weight of the bob, free-falling bodies of any mass have constant acceleration. It was Newton's achievement to show that Kepler's...
Page 34 - But if I had known you were coming I would have baked a cake!
Page 4 - ... about what is good and bad, right and wrong, just and unjust — in ethics, aesthetics, political philosophy.

About the author (2005)

Alexander Rosenberg is Professor of Philosophy at Duke University, North Carolina, USA. His ten books in the philosophy of science include The Structure of Biological Science (1985) and Philosophy of Social Science (1995). He has been a Guggenheim Fellow, a Fellow of the American Council of Learned Societies and the National Science Foundation. In 1993 he won the Lakatos Prize in the Philosophy of Science.

Bibliographic information