Research on criminal justice organizations: the sentencing process |
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
Section | 1 |
ISSUES IN RESEARCH ON SENTENCING PROSECUTION AND ARREST | 22 |
SELECTING A RESEARCH TOPIC | 36 |
3 other sections not shown
Common terms and phrases
aim of sentenc analysis arrest attitudes behavior BERNARD COHEN cohort commitment sentences conducting research consequences of sentencing court crime criminal justice organizations criminal justice system deal decisionmaking process definite sentence determine discretion disparity in sentencing effects evaluation studies example factors felony findings follow-up goals guidelines Hogarth host agency hypotheses hypothesis development impact important indeterminate sentence individual interview issues judges judicial decisionmaking limited magistrates major mandatory sentence Martinson milieu therapy minimum-maximum official operational outcome measures parole board penal and treatment percent plea bargaining police position practitioners prison probation problems procedures prosecution prosecutors psychotherapy R&D-funding agencies Rand Corporation recidivism rehabilitation release research design research on criminal research study research topic sample selected Sentencing councils sentencing decision sentencing process sentencing system social specific subjects tencing theory tion treatment programs type of commitment types of offenders utilized variables
Bibliographic information
| Title | Research on criminal justice organizations: the sentencing process R (Rand Corporation) Rand report, Rand Corporation [Report] // Rand Volume 2018 of Rand Corporation Report R- |
| Authors | Bernard Cohen, Stephen H. Leinen |
| Publisher | Rand, 1976 |
| Length | 117 pages |
| Subjects | Criminal justice, Administration of Prison sentences Sentences (Criminal procedure) |
| Export Citation | BiBTeX EndNote RefMan |