Aspen Community Types of the Intermountain RegionIntermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1988 - Aspen - 135 pages |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 56
Page
... Range of Different Vegetation Elements in Aspen Communities of the Intermountain Region ......... H. Means , Standard Errors , and Ranges ... Livestock Forage ...... L1 . Means , Standard Errors , and Ranges of Annual Undergrowth Production ...
... Range of Different Vegetation Elements in Aspen Communities of the Intermountain Region ......... H. Means , Standard Errors , and Ranges ... Livestock Forage ...... L1 . Means , Standard Errors , and Ranges of Annual Undergrowth Production ...
Page 1
... range for livestock , they are also considered prime habitat for many species of wildlife , productive watersheds , and significant contributors to western scen- ery ( DeByle and Winokur 1985 ) . Although these lands historically have ...
... range for livestock , they are also considered prime habitat for many species of wildlife , productive watersheds , and significant contributors to western scen- ery ( DeByle and Winokur 1985 ) . Although these lands historically have ...
Page 4
... livestock industry . The lush undergrowth of aspen forests was considered excellent summer range . Over a century of grazing - frequently intense in the late 1800's and early 1900's , and by different classes of livestock as well as ...
... livestock industry . The lush undergrowth of aspen forests was considered excellent summer range . Over a century of grazing - frequently intense in the late 1800's and early 1900's , and by different classes of livestock as well as ...
Page 11
... livestock forage . The proportion of production in the " desirable " suitability class ranged between community types from a low of 23 percent to a high of 76 percent and averaged 59 percent ( as judged by USDA Forest Service 1981 ) ...
... livestock forage . The proportion of production in the " desirable " suitability class ranged between community types from a low of 23 percent to a high of 76 percent and averaged 59 percent ( as judged by USDA Forest Service 1981 ) ...
Page 21
... cattle use . Such use by sheep will tend to re- duce the amount of palatable forbs and shift species com- position toward dominance by such grasses as E. glaucus and B. carinatus . Prolonged abusive grazing by either class of livestock ...
... cattle use . Such use by sheep will tend to re- duce the amount of palatable forbs and shift species com- position toward dominance by such grasses as E. glaucus and B. carinatus . Prolonged abusive grazing by either class of livestock ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
Abies lasiocarpa abundant Agastache urticifolia Agropyron trachycaulum Amelanchier alnifolia Annual aspen communities Aspen reproduction aspen stands averaged Berberis repens Bridger-Teton National Forest Bromus carinatus Calamagrostis rubescens Carex geyeri Carex rossii classification Mueggler climax composition conifers contorta cover type Distribution-This dominated elevations Elymus glaucus engelmannii FORB c.t. forbs ft²/acre ft³/acre/year Geranium viscosissimum graminoids grazing habitat type Hackelia floribunda herb Idaho Intermountain Region kg/ha lb/acre low shrub Lupinus argenteus m²/ha m³/ha/year mean SE range menziesii moderate Mueggler and Campbell National Forests classification Nemophila breviflora Nevada northern Utah occidentalis Osmorhiza chilensis overstory Pachystima percent cover Pinus Poa pratensis Populus tremuloides Populus tremuloides-Abies POTR POTR/CARU production of undergrowth prominent range for livestock Rosa woodsii seral stage shrub stratum shrubs slopes species stand maturity stands sampled stems/acre Stipa successional suckers/acre summer range Symphoricarpos oreophilus SYOR tall forbs tall shrub Targhee National Forests Thalictrum fendleri tree basal area tree layer U.S. Department undergrowth production