Electric Vehicles: Efforts to Complete Advanced Battery Development Will Require More Time and Funding
DIANE Publishing, 1996 - 44 pages
In early 1991, the three domestic auto companies formed a partnership known as the U.S. Advanced Battery Consortium (USABC) to jointly sponsor advanced battery research. Later that year, the U.S. Dept. of Energy (DOE) and representatives of the electric utility industry agreed to work together with the consort. This report determines 1. the progress that the USABC has made toward reaching its long-term and mid-term goals; 2. the funding that has been spent as of FY 1995 and the additional amounts, if any, that will be needed; and 3. the role of the DoE in managing the consortium.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
achieve addition Advanced Battery Consortium Advanced Battery Technology amount Appendix Argonne National Laboratory battery development contracts battery pack battery research close-out audits Company and Saft Consortium officials believe contracting officer Contracts and CRADAs conventional vehicles cooperative agreement cost-sharing Department of Energy DOE and USABC doe contracting doe officials doe's national laboratories DOE's Role driving range Electric and Hybrid electric utilities electric vehicles energy security epri feasibility funds gasoline-powered vehicles Hybrid Propulsion Division Hybrid Vehicle kilowatt-hour large number lessons learned document licensing fees lithium iron disulfide long-term and mid-term long-term batteries long-term goals managing the consortium mandates Mid-Term Battery Development mid-term goals negotiations nickel metal hydride Ovonic's Phase pilot-plant production Provisions for Repaying Repaying DOE repayment provisions research and development Role in USABC's Saft America Table IV.3 Technical Advisory Committee United States Advanced usabc Management Committee usabc officials usabc partners usabc program USABC's Contracts USABC's Long-Term USABC's Management W.R. Grace watt-hours
Page 3 - Electric and Hybrid Vehicle Research, Development, and Demonstration Act of 1976...
Page 34 - Resources, and Science Issues US General Accounting Office Washington, DC 20548 Dear Mr Rezendes: Thank you for...
Page 36 - More extensive technical and editorial coMents are being provided to the General Accounting Office under separate cover. The Department hopes that the convents in both letters will be helpful in the preparation of the final report.
Page 15 - Please call me at (202) 512-3841 if you or your staff have any questions. Major contributors to this report are listed in appendix V.
Page 31 - There is significant potential for major improvement in the number of times a battery can be discharged and recharged before failing.
Page 22 - DOE contribution has been repaid, whichever occurs first The repayment obligation can be waived, in whole or in part, if DOE determines that repayment places USABC or its battery developers at a competitive disadvantage.
Page 4 - DOE officials who had considerable experience with advanced battery research convinced the automobile companies that considerable uncertainty existed as to whether long-term batteries could be successfully developed.
Page 28 - USABC believes both the competition and the varying approaches that result from having two contractors work on the same technology will increase the chances of success.