Justice Kennedy's Jurisprudence: The Full and Necessary Meaning of Liberty
To understand today's Supreme Court, it is essential to understand the judicial philosophy of its swing vote. For twenty years, Justice Anthony M. Kennedy has voted with the majority more than any of his colleagues. He has provided the deciding vote in cases involving politically charged issues such as affirmative action, the 2000 presidential election, religious expression, gay rights, and executive power to detain suspected terrorists. With a record reliably neither liberal nor conservative, Kennedy has generally been viewed as a capricious, indecisive moderate.
Frank Colucci, however, argues that Kennedy indeed displays a coherent approach to constitutional interpretation. Colucci digs deep into the Justice's record, offering a close analysis of not only of Kennedy's opinions on the Court but also his prior opinions on the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, his off-the-bench speeches delivered before becoming a Justice, and his testimony at confirmation hearings. Colucci identifies Kennedy's core belief: that judges have a duty to ensure the word liberty in the Constitution be given its full and necessary meaning.
Colucci shows that Kennedy rejects theories of originalism and judicial restraint. Instead, Kennedy adopts a moral reading of the Constitution—similar to that championed by Ronald Dworkin and Randy Barnett as well as former Justice William J. Brennan—in which liberty and human dignity trump even democracy.
Depicting Kennedy as seeking an alternative to the perceived excesses of both the Warren Court and originalist overreaction, Colucci also compares Kennedy's rhetoric to Catholic teaching and shows him as struggling to disassociate his personal beliefs from his official duties. Separate chapters offer close readings of Kennedy's jurisprudence regarding abortion, free speech, equality, and government structure.
Colucci's persuasive account offers readers a more nuanced understanding of Justice Kennedy's arguments about the nature of personal liberty and the proper role of courts in defining and enforcing it.
36 pages matching issue in this book
Results 1-3 of 36
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Anthony Kennedy and Abortion
Kennedys Expansive Conception of Free Speech
Kennedys Equality of Neutral Individualism
4 other sections not shown
abortion action Akron Center Amendment Anthony Anthony Kennedy Antonin Scalia argument Blackmun Papers Bowers Casey Cass Sunstein challenge citizens claims coercion commerce clause conception concurring opinion Congress constitutional criticism decision dissent district enforce equal protection Equal Protection Clause Establishment Clause expression federal government federal power fetal following citations free speech fundamental Gonzales homosexual human dignity ideal individual liberty interest interpretation involving issue judges judgment judicial power judicial role Justice justify Kennedy admits Kennedy finds Kennedy writes Kennedy's opinion Law Review Lawrence legislative limits majority opinion ment moral neutral individualism O'Connor peremptory challenges personal liberty Planned Parenthood plurality political presumption of liberty principles race racial classifications Randy Barnett Rapanos regulation Rehnquist rejects religious requires rhetoric Roper Scalia seeks separation of powers sovereign immunity split atom statute Stenberg strike substantive Supreme Court text refer tion tradition University Press uphold violation vote woman