What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
affected apoplexy appeared believe Bellingham Bicetre brain cause character circumstances committed common law conduct confined consequences considered court crime criminal act degree delirium delirium tremens delusion dementia disease disposition doubt drunkenness epilepsy Esquirol evidence evinced excitement existence expert fact faculties feelings friends furnish Georget habits hallucinations homicidal hospital idea imbecility impairment influence insane person intellectual judge Jurisprudence jury justice kill kind laboring latter less lucid interval lunatic madness mania manifested marriage Medical Jurisprudence ment mental condition mental derangement mind monomaniac moral morbid motive murder nature never object observed opinion ordinary paroxysm party passion pathological patient physician plea of insanity principle prisoner proof propensity punishment pyromania question rational reason regard relations respecting responsibility sanity says senile dementia simulation Sir John Nicholl sometimes somnambulism somnambulist sound strong sufficient suicide supposed symptoms testator things thought tion trial unsound verdict views wife witness wrong
Page 59 - ... to establish a defense on the ground of insanity it must be clearly proved that, at the time of the committing of the act, the party accused was laboring under such a defect of reason from disease of the mind as not to know the nature and quality of the act he was doing, or, if he did know it, that he did not know he was doing what was wrong.
Page 47 - What are the proper questions to be submitted to the jury, where a person alleged to be afflicted with insane delusion respecting one or more particular subjects or persons, is charged with the commission of a crime (murder, for example), and insanity is set up as a defence?" And, thirdly, "In what terms ought the question to be left to the jury as to the prisoner's state of mind at the time when the act was committed?
Page 324 - And, to deal plainly, I fear I am not in my perfect mind. Methinks I should know you and know this man; Yet I am doubtful; for I am mainly ignorant What place this is, and all the skill I have Remembers not these garments; nor I know not Where I did lodge last night. Do not laugh at me; For, as I am a man, I think this lady To be my child Cordelia.
Page 64 - Whether a party is guilty of negligence, or not, is a question of fact for the jury, and not a question of law for the court to decide, when the evidence tends to establish such negligence.
Page 69 - Our statutes may declare, as they do, that " no act done by a person in a state of insanity can be punished as an offence, and no insane person can be tried, sentenced to any punishment, or punished for any crime or offence while he continues in that state.
Page 344 - There may be an unseen ligament pressing on the mind, drawing it to consequences which it sees, but cannot avoid, and placing it under a coercion, which, while its results are clearly perceived, is incapable of resistance. The doctrine which acknowledges this mania is dangerous in its relations, and can be recognized only in the clearest cases. It ought to be shown to have been habitual, or at least to have evinced itself in more than a single instance.
Page 634 - ... opinion in the terms above stated, because each of those questions involves the determination of the truth of the facts deposed to, which it is for the jury to decide, and the questions are not mere questions upon a matter of science, in which case such evidence is admissible. But where the facts are admitted . or not disputed, and the question becomes substantially one of science only, it may be convenient to allow the question to be put in that general form, though the same cannot be insisted...
Page 48 - ... must be considered in the same situation as to responsibility as if the facts with respect to which the delusion exists were real.
Page 48 - If his delusion was that the deceased had inflicted a serious injury to his character and fortune, and he killed him in revenge for such supposed injury, he would be liable to punishment.