What's Wrong with Addiction?

Front Cover
Melbourne University Publish, 2002 - Psychology - 228 pages
0 Reviews
This is an impressive work: carefully structured, researched and written . . . a refreshingly lucid account that is both intellectually stimulating and professionally helpful.-Janet McCalman Addicts are generally regarded with either pity or grave disapproval. But is being addicted to something necessarily bad? These attitudes are explicit both in contemporary medical literature and in popular, self-help texts. We categorise addiction as unnatural, diseased and self-destructive. We demonise pleasure and desire, and view the addict as physically and morally damaged. Helen Keane's thought-provoking text examines these assumptions in a new light. In asserting that the 'wrongness' of addiction is not fixed or indeed obvious, she presents a refreshing challenge to more conventional accounts of addiction. She also investigates the notion that people can be addicted to eating, love and sex, just as they are to drugs and alcohol. What's Wrong with Addiction? shows that most of our ideas about addiction take certain ideals of health and normality for granted. It exposes strains in our society's oppositions between health and disease, between the natural and the artificial, between order and disorder, and between self and other.
 

What people are saying - Write a review

We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.

Contents

The Substance of Drugs
12
Reading the Signs of Disorder Diagnosing Dependence
36
Further and Further from the Normal World The Addicted Self
64
Smoking Addiction and Time
89
Disorders of Eating and the Healthy Diet How to Eat Well
110
Sex and Love Addiction The Ethics and Erotics of Intimacy
137
The Recovery Habit
157
Conclusion
188
Notes
193
Bibliography
205
Index
222
Copyright

Common terms and phrases

Popular passages

Page 9 - The abject-' designates here precisely those "unlivable" and "uninhabitable" zones of social life which are nevertheless densely populated by those who do not enjoy the status of the subject, but whose living under the sign of the "unlivable" is required to circumscribe the domain of the subject.
Page 7 - ... there is no power relation without the correlative constitution of a field of knowledge, nor any knowledge that does not presuppose and constitute at the same time power relations.

References to this book

All Book Search results »

Bibliographic information