Uncivil Agreement: How Politics Became Our Identity
Political polarization in America is at an all-time high, and the conflict has moved beyond disagreements about matters of policy. For the first time in more than twenty years, research has shown that members of both parties hold strongly unfavorable views of their opponents. This is polarization rooted in social identity, and it is growing. The campaign and election of Donald Trump laid bare this fact of the American electorate, its successful rhetoric of “us versus them” tapping into a powerful current of anger and resentment.
With Uncivil Agreement, Lilliana Mason looks at the growing social gulf across racial, religious, and cultural lines, which have recently come to divide neatly between the two major political parties. She argues that group identifications have changed the way we think and feel about ourselves and our opponents. Even when Democrats and Republicans can agree on policy outcomes, they tend to view one other with distrust and to work for party victory over all else. Although the polarizing effects of social divisions have simplified our electoral choices and increased political engagement, they have not been a force that is, on balance, helpful for American democracy. Bringing together theory from political science and social psychology, Uncivil Agreement clearly describes this increasingly “social” type of polarization in American politics and will add much to our understanding of contemporary politics.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Two Using Old Words in New Ways
Three A Brief History of Social Sorting
Four Partisan Prejudice
Five Socially Sorted Parties
Six The Outrage and Elation of Partisan Sorting
Seven Activism for the Wrong Reasons
Other editions - View all
abortion Alan Abramowitz aligned American electorate American partisans American politics angry Barack Obama Bold coefficients church attendance citizens coded to range confidence intervals shown conflict conservative cross-cutting identities Democratic Party Democrats and Republicans difference Donald Trump drive effect of sorting election emotions extremity and constraint feel group identities iden ideological identity important increase ingroup ingroup bias intergroup Issue constraint issue extremity issue positions issue-based levels of sorting liberal Marilynn Brewer matched measure Ninety-five percent confidence opponents Originating regressions outgroup candidate outgroup partisans participate partisan identity partisan prejudice partisan-ideological sorting partisanship party identity percent confidence intervals percentage points policy attitudes policy opinions policy positions political action political knowledge predicted values pro-choice pro-life racial Rattlers religious Republican Party respondents sample scale social groups social identities social identity theory social polarization social sorting social-distance bias Sociopartisan sorting standard errors strong partisans threat Trump V. O. Key vote voters warmth bias YouGov