Trust: Reason, Routine, Reflexivity
What makes trust such a powerful concept? Is it merely that in trust the whole range of social forces that we know play together? Or is it that trust involves a peculiar element beyond those we can account for?
While trust is an attractive and evocative concept that has gained increasing popularity across the social sciences, it remains elusive, its many facets and applications obscuring a clear overall vision of its essence. In this book, Guido Möllering reviews a broad range of trust research and extracts three main perspectives adopted in the literature for understanding trust. Accordingly, trust is presented as a matter of reason, routine or reflexivity. While all these perspectives contribute something to our understanding of trust, Möllering shows that they imply, but cannot explain, 'suspension' - the leap of faith that is typical of trust. He therefore proposes a new direction in trust research that builds on existing perspectives but places the suspension of uncertainty and vulnerability at the heart of the concept of trust. Beyond a purely theoretical line of argument, the author discusses implications for empirical studies of trust and presents original case material that captures the experience of trust in terms of reason, routine, reflexivity and suspension. Möllering concludes by suggesting how the new approach can enhance the relevance of trust research and its contributions to broader research agendas concerning the constitution of positive expectations in the face of prevalent uncertainty and change at various levels in our economies and societies.
The book is essential reading for anyone who wants to gain a thorough understanding of trust. It can serve as a general introduction for advanced students and scholars in the social sciences, especially in economics, sociology, psychology and management. For more experienced researchers, it is a challenging and provocative critique of the field and a new approach to understanding trust.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Trust and Reason
Trust and Routine
Trust and Reflexivity
2.1 THE RATIONALIST account of trust become so objectified benevolence and solidarity circumscribes the paradigm common account conveys an ap dependent variable difficult rational choices dynamic and incomprehensible emphasizes taken-for-grantedness empirical enact this trust explaining trust express trust primarily expresses three important Georg Simmel 1908 Hardin expresses three increasing obj edification inescapably stamps leap of faith longer some foundation mainstream of trust methodological individualism natural and common needs any properly objectified that confidence PARADIGM A natural performing corresponding actions position which inescapably predispositions and embedded presuming their benevolence proach to explaining properly personal knowledge quired reason or routine Routine 3.1 TAKEN-FOR-GRANTEDNESS routine or reflexivity Russell Hardin expresses Simmel's concerns stamps the individ TAKEN-FOR-GRANTEDNESS Every day thy others appear Trust and Routine trust countless trust express trust trust is decisive trust is reasonable trust is selective trust repre trust research trust that emphasizes trustee's trustworthiness trustor's perception trustors draw umbrella advocates