R. M. Berry, Jeffrey R. Di Leo
SUNY Press, May 11, 2015 - Literary Criticism - 311 pages
Combining creative and critical responses from some of today’s most progressive and innovative novelists, critics, and theorists, Fiction’s Present adventurously engages the aesthetic, political, philosophical, and cultural dimensions of contemporary fiction. By juxtaposing scholarly articles with essays by practicing novelists, the book takes up not only the current state of literature and its criticism but also connections between contemporary philosophy and contemporary fiction. In doing so, the contributors aim to provoke further discussion of the present inflection of fiction—a present that can be seen as Janus-faced, looking both forward to the novel’s radically changed, political, economic, and technological circumstances, and back to its history of achievements and problems.
Editors R. M. Berry and Jeffrey R. Di Leo contend that examinations of fiction’s present are most informative not when they defend philosophical distinctions or develop literary classifications, but when they grapple with elusive topics such as the meaning of a narrative present or the relation of fiction’s medium to its representations of context. As the essays reveal, this process, when pursued diligently, breaks down traditional divisions of academic and intellectual labor, compelling the fiction writer to become more philosophical and the theorist to become more imaginative. The value of this book is not in the exhaustiveness of its treatment, but rather in the seriousness of the criticism it incites. The present materializes in quarrel, and it is toward such a beginning that the writings in Fiction’s Present work.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
James Cather Vollmann and the Distinction of Historical Fiction
Fourteen Notes Toward the Musicality of Creative Disjunction or Fiction by Collage
Mount Rushmore Four Brief Essays on Fictions
Recognition as a Depleted Source in Lynne Tillmans Motion Sickness
Critifictional Reﬂections on the Pathetic Condition of the Novel in Our Time
Henry Miller to Henry James
In Their Own Words The Collective Presents Itself
American WorldFiction in the Longue Durée
Postpostmodern Discontent Contemporary Fiction and the Social World
Toward the Edge of the Hermetic Notes on Raising Fiction from the Dead
The SelfDeceiving Muse Fiction and the Rationalistic Dictates of the Present
Notes on Fiction and Philosophy
Other editions - View all
Fiction's Present: Situating Contemporary Narrative Innovation
R. M. Berry,Jeffrey R. Di Leo
Limited preview - 2008
Acker action aesthetic American Barth Beckett become belief Benito Cereno Black Ice Books Brooke-Rose Carole Maso Cather Chapter character Christine Brooke-Rose cognitive Cohn Cohn’s collage Collective’s conﬂict consciousness constraints contemporary context critical cultural David Foster Wallace deﬁned deﬁnition Defoe difﬁculty discourse distinction doxa essay fact Fathers and Crows Federman ﬁction Fiction Collective ﬁction writers ﬁction’s present ﬁctional ﬁeld ﬁgures ﬁlm ﬁnally ﬁnd ﬁrst Flaubert’s forest Franzen global Heidegger historical present history’s imagination inﬂuence intentionally left blank ivory tower James’s Joseph McElroy Kathy Acker language literary literature means Melville Melville’s mind Motion Sickness narrator nation novel novelist one’s past perhaps philosophical political possible post-postmodernism postmodern Press published reader reading reality recognition reﬂect Robert Coover Ronald Sukenick self-deception sense signiﬁcance social space speciﬁc story structure television theory things Tillman tion Touﬁc University Vollmann words world-ﬁction writing York
Page v - Art lives upon discussion, upon experiment, upon curiosity, upon variety of attempt, upon the exchange of views and the comparison of standpoints; and there is a presumption that those times when no one has anything particular to say about it, and has no reason to give for practice or preference, though they may be times of honour, are not times of development — are times, possibly even, a little of dullness.