Lapdogs: How the Press Rolled Over for BushLapdogs is the first book to demonstrate that, for the entire George W. Bush presidency, the news media have utterly failed in their duty as watchdog for the public. In blistering prose, Eric Boehlert reveals how, time after time, the press chose a soft approach to covering the government, and as a result reported and analyzed crucial events incompletely and even inaccurately. From WMDs to Valerie Plame to the NSA's domestic spying, mainstream fixtures such as The New York Times, CBS, CNN, and Time magazine too often ignored the administration's missteps and misleading words, and did not call out the public officials who betrayed the country's trust. Throughout both presidential campaigns and the entire Iraq war to date, the media acted as a virtual mouthpiece for the White House, giving watered-down coverage of major policy decisions, wartime abuses of power, and egregious mistakes -- and sometimes these events never made it into the news at all. Finally, in Lapdogs, the press is being held accountable by one of its own. Boehlert homes in on the reasons the press did not do its job: a personal affinity for Bush that journalists rarely displayed toward his predecessor, Bill Clinton; a Republican White House that threatened to deny access to members of the media who asked challenging questions or voiced criticism; and a press that feared being tainted by accusations of liberal bias. Moreover, journalists -- who may have wanted to report accurately on the important stories -- often found themselves at cross-purposes with media executives, many of whom were increasingly driven by economic concerns. Cowed by all of these factors, the media abandoned their traditional role of stirring up meaningful public debate. Boehlert asserts that the Bush White House never subscribed to the view -- commonly held by previous administrations -- that a relationship with the press is an important part of the democratic process. Instead, it saw the press as just another special interest group that needed to be either appeased or held at bay -- or, in some cases, squashed. The administration actively undermined the basic tenets of accurate and fair journalism, and reporters and editors accepted their reduced roles without a whimper. To an unprecedented degree, journalists too often stopped asking uncomfortable questions of people in power. In essence, the entire purpose and pursuit of journalism was sacrificed. Riveting in its sharp denouncement, supported by dozens of glaring and troubling examples of journalistic malpractice, Lapdogs thoroughly dissects the press's misconduct during Bush's presidency and gives voice to the growing public dismay with the mainstream media. |
Contents
Afraid of the Facts | 1 |
From the Big Apple to the Big Easy | 19 |
Watching the White House Play Hardball | 53 |
Copyright | |
11 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
ABC's allegations American antiwar asked attack Beltway bloggers Boston Globe Bush's campaign CBS's Cheney Clinton CNN's conservative Coulter coverage critics Daily Howler debate Democrats Downing Street memo editors Emphasis added fact insisted interview invasion Iraq Iraqi John Kerry journalism journalists July June K Street Project Kerry Kerry's Koppel Libby liberal bias Malkin March Matthews Meet the Press military months MSM's MSNBC National Guard NBC's Newsweek Nightline Note O'Neill officials outlets PBS's percent Plame political poll president presidential press corps press haters public broadcasting pundits questions reporters Republican right-wing Rush Limbaugh Rush Limbaugh Show Russert Saddam Salon Schiavo Senator Sept Sheehan simply story Swift Boat Swift Boat Veterans talking television Terri Schiavo Texas Tim Russert Times's timidity tion told Tomlinson Vietnam Washington Post weeks White House Woodward wrote York