Design for Independent Living: The Environment and Physically Disabled People |
Contents
Disability and the Experience | 19 |
An Open Letter to Architects | 35 |
Clients as People | 53 |
Hidden Agendas | 67 |
Using the User Well | 81 |
Dispelling Stereotypes | 97 |
The Vitalizing Challenge of Dissonance | 123 |
Group Cohesion and Openness | 155 |
Conclusion | 181 |
Other editions - View all
Rethinking Architecture: Design Students and Physically Disabled People Raymond Lifchez Limited preview - 1986 |
Rethinking Architecture: Design Students and Physically Disabled People Raymond Lifchez Limited preview - 2022 |
Rethinking Architecture: Design Students and Physically Disabled People Raymond Lifchez Limited preview - 2023 |
Common terms and phrases
ability able able-bodied architects architectural design asked barrier-free design began Berkeley blind buildings built environment cerebral palsy Cheryl Davis Chief Usher client group crip critiques dents design problem design process design teams develop disabled consultants disabled design consultants disabled person elderly environment evaluate example expected experience feel felt floor friends Friendship House grab bars group process handicapped human imagine Independent Living instructors interactions interests interviews involved journal Kansas State University looked ment models move needs never observers paraplegic parents Peter physically disabled design Physically Disabled User professional quadriplegics quarter questions ramp Raymond Lifchez realized requirements residents responsibility role scenarios seemed semantic differential skills social Sojourner Truth stereotypes Steve Steve Hoffman structure studio course sultants talk teaching team members term things thought tions U.C. Berkeley understand urban renewal User in Mind user participation wheelchair user