Why History?: Ethics and PostmodernityWhy History is an introduction to the issue of history and ethics. Designed to provoke discussion, the book asks whether a good knowledge and understanding of the past is a good thing to have and if so, why. In the context of postmodern times, Why History suggests that the goal of 'learning lessons from the past' is actually learning lessons from stories written by historians and others. If the past as history has no foundation, can anything ethical be gained from history? |
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
PARTI | 35 |
On Jean Baudrillard | 56 |
On JeanFrançois Lyotard | 71 |
PART II | 91 |
On Hayden White | 115 |
On Frank Ankersmit | 133 |
Beyond histories and ethics | 161 |
On David Harlan | 184 |
Promisings | 201 |
Further reading | 223 |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accept Accordingly actually allows Ankersmit answer appropriate argues argument attempt basis Baudrillard become choice closure coming concept condition Consequently constitute construct context contingent course critique culture decision deconstruction defence definitive Derrida discourse effect Ermarth ethics Evans Evans's example existence fact fiction final future genre give given Harlan historians Ibid idea illusion imaginaries imagined impossible interested interpretation ironic kind language least linguistic live logic longer look lower Lyotard meaning modernist modes moral narrative nature never notion object past perhaps philosophy political position possible postmodern postmodernists practices precisely present principle problems produced proper question radical reality reason refer relativism remains remarks rhetoric Rorty rules seems sense social sort statements theory things thought truth University White writing