Natural Right and History
In this classic work, Leo Strauss examines the problem of natural right and argues that there is a firm foundation in reality for the distinction between right and wrong in ethics and politics. On the centenary of Strauss's birth, and the fiftieth anniversary of the Walgreen Lectures which spawned the work, Natural Right and History remains as controversial and essential as ever.
"Strauss . . . makes a significant contribution towards an understanding of the intellectual crisis in which we find ourselves . . . [and] brings to his task an admirable scholarship and a brilliant, incisive mind."—John H. Hallowell, American Political Science Review
Leo Strauss (1899-1973) was the Robert Maynard Hutchins Distinguished Service Professor Emeritus in Political Science at the University of Chicago.
What people are saying - Write a review
absolute according to nature Aristotle Aristotle Nicomachean Ethics basis become best regime Burke chap character Cicero Republic cive civil society claims classical concerned conflict convention conventionalism distinction distinguished divine doctrine duties Epicurean Epicurus essentially existence fact forced freedom French Revolution fundamental genuine happiness hence historical school historicism historicist Hobbes Hobbes's Hooker human thought Ibid implies individual justice knowledge law of nature legitimate Leviathan Locke Locke's man's natural means merely moral natural law natural law teaching natural right necessarily Nicomachean Ethics notion one's original perfection Plato Republic pleasure political philosophy possible premise presupposes principles problem Protagoras question radical rational reason regard rejection requires revelation Réveries Rousseau rule Second Discourse secs self-preservation sense social order social science Socrates spirit Summa theologica theoretical things Thomas Aquinas tion tradition Treatises truth ture ultimately understanding understood universal value judgments virtue Weber whole wisdom Wissenschaftslehre Xenophon