Out of the Closets and into the Courts: Legal Opportunity Structure and Gay Rights Litigation
Over the past 30 years, the gay rights movement has moved from the margins to the center of American politics, sparking debate from bedroom to boardroom to battlefield. Out of the Closets and into the Courts analyzes recent gay rights cases and explores the complex relationship between litigation and social change.
“ An excellent book, enlightening and well-written. Out of the Closets and into the Courts should be highly useful in the classroom and of interest to a broad audience.”
--Evan Gerstmann, Loyola Marymount University
“ A detailed historical analysis of changes in the law surrounding gay and lesbian relationships, Out of the Closets and into the Courts also breaks fresh ground in thinking about how and when law can be used to affect social change. The concept of a legal opportunity structure, which complements the concept of political opportunity structure, proves to be very useful in analyzing judicial changes in the law. A very impressive analysis.”
--Mayer Zald, Professor Emeritus, University of Michigan
“ Ellen Andersen's book integrates sophisticated sociolegal theory and thorough empirical research into a compelling, insightful analysis of legal mobilization campaigns led by the Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund. This study makes a significant contribution to scholarship about struggles over gay rights in the U.S. and about legal reform politics in general.”
--Michael McCann, University of Washington
Ellen Ann Andersen is Assistant Professor of Political Science at Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Out of the Closets and Into the Courts: Legal Opportunity Structure and Gay ...
Ellen Ann Andersen
No preview available - 2005
ACLU AIDS Alaska amicus brief antigay initiatives appeal argued argument arrested attorney Baehr Baker ballot measures bene‹ts Bowers challenge chapter civil rights civil unions Colorado con›ict consensual constitutional amendment context Court ruled Court’s decision criminal cultural frames de‹ned discrimination domestic partnership equal protection gay rights activists gay rights advocates gay rights claims gay rights laws gay rights litigators Georgia Georgia’s sodomy Goodridge groups Hardwick Hawaii heterosexual homosexuality in›uence involved issue judicial Justice Lambda Lawrence legal and cultural legal frames legal opportunities legislative legislature lesbian lesbians and gay majority Massachusetts Model Penal Code nation O’Connor of‹ce opportunity structure organization percent plaintiffs political opportunity prohibiting re›ected relationship repeal right to privacy Romer same-sex couples same-sex marriage sexual orientation shifts signi‹cant social movement sociolegal sodomy laws sodomy reform sodomy statutes speci‹c state’s structure of legal task force Texas Texas’s tion U.S. Supreme Court Vermont violated vote