Proposed new judgeship needs determination methodology: the report of the Judicial Council Advisory Committee on Court Profiles
Administrative Office of the Courts, 1993 - Biography & Autobiography
10 pages matching benchmark values in this book
Results 1-3 of 10
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
additional judgeships Alameda County Attorney Attorney at Law available judicial resources benchmark values branch courts commissioners and referees Committee on Court COUNTY CLERKS court-specific values criminal DATE ACTIVITY determining judgeship needs developed End Start End estimate filings identified impact on judicial implementation judge-year value judgeship need methodology judgeship needs determination Judgeship Needs Report Judgeship Needs Standing judicial need judicial positions judicial resource utilization JURY INSTRUCTION jury trial justice court judges Legislature management practices Mistrial municipal and justice need for judgeships Needs Standing Advisory number of judges oversight committee participating courts pending caseload Peter McNamee plea negotiation pretrial procedures prototype model quantifiable quantitative information quantitative model range of judgeships ranking requesting sampled San Diego County Santa Clara County severity of need simulation model Solano County staff Standing Advisory Committee statewide benchmarks Statewide Judgeship Needs Step Superior Court variables voir dire weighted caseload methodology workload YES NO IMPACT