Anyone Who Has a View: Theoretical Contributions to the Study of Argumentation
Springer Science & Business Media, Oct 31, 2003 - Language Arts & Disciplines - 346 pages
This volume of the Argumentation Library contains a collection of twenty-six theor etical contributions to the study of argumentation. Together they provide an over view of recent developments in the theory of argumentation which does justice to the theoretical variety in the field. InAnyone Who Has a View, the subject of argu mentation is approached from different angles. Both the formal and informal logical approaches and the rhetorical and communicative approaches arc represented in various ways. We arc convinced that the collection of essays as a whole will be of interest not only to those engaged directly in the study of argumentation, but also to scholars from a variety of disciplines who arc interested in the recent developments in this field. The book opens with an essay by the informal logician Robert C. Pinto. For all the differences between them, James B. Freeman, Harvey Siegel, Ralph H. Johnson, Hans V. Hansen, and J. Anthony Blair are also prominent members of that move ment. Some informal logicians either eschew or simply do not use formal methods in their approach to argumentation, while others, such as David Hitchcock, use both formal and informal methods. Erik C.W. Krabbe is a logician who proudly defends a formal dialectical approach to argumentation. Daniel H. Cohen, Frans H. van Eemeren, Peter Houtlosser, Fred J. Kauffeld, C. Scott Jacobs, Christian Kock, Christian Plantin, Sorin Stati, Chris Reed, Douglas N.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
THE PRAGMATIC DIMENSION OF PREMISE ACCEPTABILITY
RATIONALITY AND JUDGMENT
THE DIALECTICAL TIER REVISITED
THE RABBIT IN THE HAT THE INTERNAL RELATIONS OF THE PRAGMADIALECTICAL RULESą
DISCOURSE CORRESPONDENCE BETWEEN ARGUMENTATIVE AND GRAMMATICAL SEQUENCES
DIAGRAMMING ARGUMENTATION SCHEMES AND CRITICAL QUESTIONS
LEGAL ARGUMENTATION THEORY AND THE CONCEPT OF LAW
ARGUERS OBLIGATIONS ANOTHER PERSPECTIVE
CHARLES S PEIRCES THEORY OF ABDUCTION AND THE ARISTOTELIAN ENTHYMEME FROM SIGNSą
RHETORIC AND DIALECTIC IN MARTIN LUTHER KINGS LETTER FROM BIRMINGHAM JAIL
ON THE ARGUMENTATIVE QUALITY OF EXPLANATORY NARRATIVES
THE WILES OF ARGUMENT
RELATIONSHIPS AMONG LOGIC DIALECTIC AND RHETORIC
LOGICAL FALLACIES DIALECTICAL TRANSGRESSIONS RHETORICAL SINS AND OTHER FAILURES OF RATIONALITY IN ARGUMENT...
A PRAGMATIC VIEW OF THE BURDEN OF PROOF
THE ORDINARY PRACTICE OF PRESUMING AND PRESUMPTION WITH SPECIAL ATTENTION TO VERACITY AND THE BURDEN OF PR...
TWO CONCEPTIONS OF OPENNESS IN ARGUMENTATION THEORY
MULTIDIMENSIONALITY AND NONDEDUCTIVENESS IN DELIBERATIVE ARGUMENTATION
ARGUMENTATION STUDIES IN FRANCE
FELICITY CONDITIONS FOR THE CIRCUMSTANTIAL AD HOMINEM
THE POTENTIAL CONFLICT BETWEEN NORMATIVELYGOOD ARGUMENTATIVE PRACTICE AND PERSUASIVE SUCCESS
THE CONCEPT OF ARGUMENT QUALITY IN THE ELABORATION LIKELIHOOD MODEL
HOW NARRATIVE ARGUMENTATION WORKS
LIST OF CONTRIBUTORS
abduction accept action ad hominem analysis appeal to expert argu arguer argument quality argument strength argument valence argumentation scheme argumentation studies argumentation theory Aristotle Aristotle's audience believe burden of proof Cacioppo claim cognitive concept conclusion context Court critical discussion critical questions debate decision deductive deductively valid deliberative argumentation dialectical tier dialogue discourse Eemeren Elaboration Likelihood Model enthymeme epistemic evaluation evidence example expert opinion explanation explicit fallacies Florida Supreme Court Govier Grootendorst grounds inference Informal Logic interlocutor issue Johnson judgment justified manifest rationality ment mentation metadialogue Minor Premise moral correlation narrative narrativists norms objections obligation Odysseus participants party Peirce Peirce's perspective persuasive Philosophy position practice Pragma-Dialectical pragmatic premises Press presumption problem proposal proposition reasons relevant responses rhetoric rules sense speech act standpoint Study of Argumentation syllogism tion Toulmin U.S. Supreme Court University University of Windsor validity Walton warrant weak arguments