The Oxford Debate on the Textual Critcism of the New Testament Held 04-The Oxford Debate on the Textual Criticism of the New Testament Held at New College on May 6, 1897: With a Preface Explanatory of the Rival Systems
1897 - Bible - 59 pages
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
A. C. HEADLAM agree Aleph Alexandrian Antioch Aphraates argument authoritative revision authorities Caesarea Canon character Church conﬁrm Conﬂation considerable copies course Cureton Curetonian MSS cursives Cyril of Alexandria Dean Burgon deﬁnite difference difﬁcult discussion doubt early Ephraem Syrus existence Fathers favour ﬁfth century ﬁfty ﬁnd ﬁrst place fourth century Gospels Greek MSS Gregory of Nyssa Gwilliam Holy Scripture Hort’s system Hort’s theory inﬂuence instances justiﬁed later Latin Versions Lewis and Curetonian Lewis Codex Lucian of Antioch maintain manuscripts Margaret Professor mass of MSS Miller Neutral Text Nicene Creed Notes of Truth Old Latin Origen origin passages perhaps Peshitto PROFESSOR SANDAY question quotations quoted reason Received Text refer represent second century side Sinaitic supported suppose Syriac Version Tatian Testament Textual Criticism Tischendorf Traditional Text true Text type of text Uncial Vatican verse Vulgate Westcott and Hort Western Text words writers