Marcan Priority Without Q: Explorations in the Farrer HypothesisJohn C. Poirier, Jeffrey Peterson This book discusses the composition of the synoptic gospels from the perspective of the Farrer hypothesis, a view that posits that Mark was written first, that Matthew used Mark as a source, and that Luke used both Mark and Matthew. All of the articles in the volume are written in support of the Farrer hypothesis, with the exception of the final chapter, which criticizes these articles from the perspective of the reigning Two-Source theory. The contributors engage the synoptic problem with a more refined understanding of the options set before each of the evangelists pointing towards a deepened understanding of how works were compiled in the first and early second centuries CE. The contributors include Andris Abakuks, Stephen Carlson, Eric Eve, Mark Goodacre, Heather Gorman, John S. Kloppenborg, David Landry, Mark Matson, Ken Olson, Michael Pahl, Jeffrey Peterson, and John C. Poirier. |
Contents
| 1 | |
| 16 | |
Problems With the NonAversion Principle for Reconstructing Q | 44 |
Crank or Creative Genius? How Ancient Thetoric Makes Sense of Lukes Order | 62 |
Too Good to Be Q High Verbatim Agreement in the Double Tradition | 82 |
Luke 1124 The Lords Prayer Abridged Edition | 101 |
A Statistical Time Series Approach to the Use of Mark by Matthew and Luke | 119 |
Matthews Ending and the Genesis of LukeActs The Farrer Hypothesis and the Birth of Christian History | 140 |
Reconsidering the Date of Luke in Light of the Farrer Hypothesis | 160 |
Delbert Burketts Defense of Q | 191 |
The FarrerMark Without Q Hypothesis A Response | 226 |
| 245 | |
| 260 | |
| 269 | |
Other editions - View all
Marcan Priority Without Q: Explorations in the Farrer Hypothesis Jeffrey Peterson No preview available - 2015 |
Marcan Priority Without Q: Explorations in the Farrer Hypothesis John C. Poirier,Jeffrey Peterson No preview available - 2015 |
Marcan Priority Without Q: Explorations in the Farrer Hypothesis Jeffrey Peterson No preview available - 2016 |
Common terms and phrases
ancient rhetorical argued arguments Beelzebul Controversy Biblical Burkett Christian claim context Critical Derrenbacker and Kloppenborg Didache dif¿cult disciples double tradition doubly attested Downing’s E. P. Sanders ëÅ essay evangelists evidence example exorcisms Farrer hypothesis Farrerians Father fatigue Fitzmyer Goodacre’s gospel of Luke Gospel of Matthew Goulder Greek Griesbach hypothesis gures high verbatim agreement Jesus John Josephus JSNTSup Leuven literary Lord’s Prayer Lucan Luke knew Luke–Acts Luke’s Luke’s gospel Luke’s version Marcan priority Marcion Mark and Q Mark Goodacre Mark’s material Matthaean Matthew and Luke Matthew’s gospel minor agreements narrative non-aversion principle omit oral tradition parallel passages Paul Paul’s pericope phrase progymnasmata question reÀect reconstruction redaction reference retained unchanged sayings scholars Sermon Shef¿eld signi¿cant speci¿c Spirit statistical story Streeter Studies Synoptic Gospels Synoptic Problem teaching Testament Töv triple tradition Tuckett University Press verse Volume words writing