The Status of No Child Left Behind Implementation in Ohio: Field Hearing Before the Committee on Education and the Workforce, U.S. House of Representatives, One Hundred Eighth Congress, Second Session, March 8, 2004 in Columbus, Ohio

Front Cover

From inside the book

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

Popular passages

Page 23 - State academic content standards and student academic achievement standards; (iv) improve classroom management skills; (vxl) are high quality, sustained, intensive, and classroom-focused in order to have a positive and lasting impact on classroom instruction and the teacher's performance in the classroom; and (II) are not 1-day or short-term workshops or conferences...
Page 6 - ... report cards for parents on school achievement levels, improved teacher quality requirements that ensure all students are being taught by a highly qualified teacher, and public school choice and supplemental service options for parents with children in underachieving...
Page 6 - Bush's education reform agenda: accountability and testing, flexibility and local control, funding for what works, and expanded parental options.
Page 8 - ... students and their parents can have choice in the public school system and receive supplemental services when they are in under-achieving environments. . I think it is important to point out that No Child Left Behind is not a one size fits all mandate. It allows states a tremendous amount of flexibility. Individual states are given the flexibility to determine a variety of factors including what factors make a student proficient, the starting point for measuring the progress of schools and students,...

Bibliographic information