The Quality of Research in Science: Methods for Postperformance Evaluation in the National Science Foundation : Report |
Contents
INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY | 1 |
PROBLEMS IN EVALUATING BASIC RESEARCH | 9 |
METHODS OF EVALUATION | 19 |
6 other sections not shown
Common terms and phrases
Academy of Sciences activities Advisory Committee Allen Wallis American Chemical Society Appendix applications assessing basic research Bell Laboratories Bell Labs biome Biomedical Research Chemical Chemistry Division citation analysis citation counts Cole Committee on Science contribution criteria Director editors evaluation of research experiments factors field identify IDOE impact important improve individual industry institutions journals knowledge laboratories large grants manuscripts ment MRL's Narin National Academy National Science Foundation NSF Chemistry NSF grants NSF program NSF support NSF's oceanography Office outcomes panels papers peer judgment peer review percent Physical Review Letters Policy polywater posals postperformance evaluation principal investigators productivity program officials proposal review proposed research publication published quality of research ratings received renewal proposals request research grants research performance research process research programs research supported retrospective analysis Rosalind Franklin sample scientific research scientists selected significant specific staff subfields Technology tion U.S. Senate University Washington young researchers