What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
3d edit 4th edit Abbott on Shipp action Adolph agent Ante arise assumpsit attorney authority Bank Bank of United Barn Bell bill bill of lading bind the principal Bing bound broker charter-party Chitty on Comm cipal civil law consignment contract corporation Court Courts of Equity Cowen Cressw debt deed deemed defendant doctrine Domat duty employed equity executed factor held Ibid implied indorse injury Inst instrument Jurisp Justice Kent latter Law & Eq Lect lien Liverm Lloyd Lord loss Mandat Manuf master Mees negligence owner Paley on Agency Pand party payment plaintiff Post Pothier on Oblig procure purchase received responsible Roman law rule seal sell Selw servant ship Smith on Merc Story on Bailm sub-agent Taunt thereof third person tion transaction trustee usage of trade Welsb Wend
Page 99 - But the rule of law is clear, that, where one by his words or conduct wilfully causes another to believe the existence of a certain state of things, and induces him to act on that belief, so as to alter his own previous position, the former is concluded from averring against the latter a different state of things as existing at the same time."* In Freeman v.
Page 520 - The master, for example, would be liable to the servant for the negligence of the chambermaid, for putting him into a damp bed ; for that of the upholsterer, for sending in a crazy bedstead, whereby he was made to fall down while asleep and injure himself; for the negligence of the cook, in not properly cleaning the copper vessels used in the kitchen...
Page 455 - It is a well-established rule of law, that where a contract, not under seal, is made with an agent in his own name, for an undisclosed principal, either the agent or the principal may sue upon it ; the defendant, in the latter case, being entitled to be placed in the same situation at the time of the disclosure of the real principal, as if the agent had been the contracting party.
Page 529 - The principle is, that a servant when he engages to serve a master undertakes, as between himself and his master, to run all the ordinary risks of the service, and this includes the risk of negligence upon the part of a fellow-servant when he is acting in the discharge of his duty as a servant of him who is the common master of both.
Page 321 - But, on the other hand, to allow evidence to be given that the party who appears on the face of the instrument to be personally a contracting party, is not such, would be to allow parol evidence to contradict the written agreement ; which cannot be done.
Page 47 - ... or upon any agreement that is not to be performed within the space of one year from the making thereof ; unless the agreement, upon which such action shall be brought or some memorandum or note thereof, shall be in writing, and signed by the party to be charged therewith, or some other person thereunto by him lawfully authorized.
Page 510 - ... for the frauds, deceits, concealments, misrepresentations, torts, negligences, and other malfeasances, or misfeasances, and omissions of duty, of his agent in the course of his employment, although the principal did not authorize, or justify, or participate in, or indeed know of such misconduct, or even if he forbade the acts or disapproved of them.
Page 525 - ... incapacity, or neglect of duty, and leave the service, if the common employer will not take such precautions, and employ such agents as the safety of the whole party may require. By these means, the safety of each will be much more effectually secured, than could be done by a resort to the common employer for indemnity in case of loss by the negligence of each other.
Page 134 - In the former case, the principal will be bound by the acts of his agent within the scope of the general authority conferred on him, although he violates, by those acts, his private instructions and directions, which are given to him by the principal, limiting, qualifying, suspending, or prohibiting the exercise of such authority under particular circumstances.
Page 525 - Where several persons are employed in the conduct of one common enterprise or undertaking, and the safety of each depends much on the care and skill with which each other shall perform his appropriate duty, each is an observer of the conduct of the others, can give notice of any misconduct, incapacity, or neglect of duty, and leave the service if the common employer will not take such precaution and employ such agents as the safety of the whole party may require.