When the State Kills: Capital Punishment and the American Condition

Front Cover
Princeton University Press, Aug 18, 2002 - Law - 324 pages

Is capital punishment just? Does it deter people from murder? What is the risk that we will execute innocent people? These are the usual questions at the heart of the increasingly heated debate about capital punishment in America. In this bold and impassioned book, Austin Sarat seeks to change the terms of that debate. Capital punishment must be stopped, Sarat argues, because it undermines our democratic society.

Sarat unflinchingly exposes us to the realities of state killing. He examines its foundations in ideas about revenge and retribution. He takes us inside the courtroom of a capital trial, interviews jurors and lawyers who make decisions about life and death, and assesses the arguments swirling around Timothy McVeigh and his trial for the bombing in Oklahoma City. Aided by a series of unsettling color photographs, he traces Americans' evolving quest for new methods of execution, and explores the place of capital punishment in popular culture by examining such films as Dead Man Walking, The Last Dance, and The Green Mile.

Sarat argues that state executions, once used by monarchs as symbolic displays of power, gained acceptance among Americans as a sign of the people's sovereignty. Yet today when the state kills, it does so in a bureaucratic procedure hidden from view and for which no one in particular takes responsibility. He uncovers the forces that sustain America's killing culture, including overheated political rhetoric, racial prejudice, and the desire for a world without moral ambiguity. Capital punishment, Sarat shows, ultimately leaves Americans more divided, hostile, indifferent to life's complexities, and much further from solving the nation's ills. In short, it leaves us with an impoverished democracy.

The book's powerful and sobering conclusions point to a new abolitionist politics, in which capital punishment should be banned not only on ethical grounds but also for what it does to Americans and what we cherish.


What people are saying - Write a review

When the state kills: capital punishment and the American condition

User Review  - Not Available - Book Verdict

Sarat (political science, Amherst Coll.; The Killing State: Capital Punishment in Law, Politics, and Culture) makes a persuasive argument here for the abolition of the death penalty. Unlike Hugo Adam ... Read full review


Introduction If Timothy McVeigh Doesnt Deserve to Die Do Who Does?
State Killing and the Politics of Vengeance
The Return of Revenge Hearing the Voice of the Victim in Capital Trials
Killing Me Softly Capital Punishment and the Technologies for Taking Life
State Killing in the Legal Process
Capital Trials and the Ordinary World of State Killing
The Role of the Jury in the Killing State
Narrative Strategy and Death Penalty Advocacy Attempting to Save the Condemned
The Cultural Life of Capital Punishment
To See or Not To See On Televising Executions
State Killing in Popular Culture Responsibility and Representation in Death Man Walking Last Dance and The Green Mile
Conclusion Toward a New Abolitionism

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

References to this book

All Book Search results »

About the author (2002)

Austin Sarat is William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Jurisprudence and Political Science at Amherst College. He is the coauthor of Divorce Lawyers and Their Clients and the editor or coeditor of numerous volumes, including The Killing State: Capital Punishment in Law, Politics, and Culture and Liberal Modernism and Democratic Individuality (Princeton).

Bibliographic information