Reasoning: Studies of Human Inference and Its Foundations
This interdisciplinary work is a collection of major essays on reasoning: deductive, inductive, abductive, belief revision, defeasible (non-monotonic), cross cultural, conversational, and argumentative. They are each oriented toward contemporary empirical studies. The book focuses on foundational issues, including paradoxes, fallacies, and debates about the nature of rationality, the traditional modes of reasoning, as well as counterfactual and causal reasoning. It also includes chapters on the interface between reasoning and other forms of thought. In general, this last set of essays represents growth points in reasoning research, drawing connections to pragmatics, cross-cultural studies, emotion and evolution.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
accepted argu argument artiﬁcial Bayesian behavior belief change belief revision belief set Cambridge Chater choice cognitive Cognitive Science concept conclusion conditional conditional probability conﬁrm conﬁrmation conﬂict conjunction conjunction fallacy deductive defeasible reasoning defeat deﬁned deﬁnition degree of belief difﬁculty discount effects ence epistemic evaluation evidence example Experimental experiments explain explanatory coherence fallacy false ﬁgure ﬁnd ﬁnding ﬁrst ﬁt full belief heuristics human hyperbolic discounting hypothesis ical inductive reasoning inference interpretation intuitions Johnson-Laird Journal judgments justiﬁcation Kahneman Kyburg logic MAMMAL ment mental models models theory modus ponens modus tollens nonmonotonic Oaksford one’s Osherson paradox possible predicate logic predicted principle prob probabilistic probability problem properties proposition Psychology quantiﬁers rational reﬂect relevant representation rule scientiﬁc semantic sentence sequence similar sion soning speciﬁc subjects syllogisms syllogistic theory tion tive true truth Tversky University Press valid