What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
acres administration agricultural American appropriation authority benefit bureau Carey Act cent charge Chief of Engineers citizens coal Colorado companies Congressional Record conservation policy Constitution construction corporations cost doctrine duty ernment exercise Federal control Federal Government flow forest reserves Forest Service Gifford Pinchot Governor grant Henry Wade Rogers homestead horsepower Idaho impose interests interstate commerce irrigation jurisdiction lease legislation Literary Digest means ment millions mining monopoly Montana mountain National Conservation Congress national forests National Government natural resources navigable streams non-navigable Oregon Outlook owner ownership pass Pinchot power development power sites power trust present privileges protect public control public domain public lands purposes question reclamation regulate commerce revenue riparian rights rivers Second National Conservation Senator servation settlement settlers sumer supply Supreme Court territory things timber tion Treasury United Washington waste water power water-power wealth West western
Page 130 - I" means the States of Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Maryland, Delaware, West Virginia, Virginia. North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, Florida, and the District of Columbia. (c) "Districts II-IV" means all of the States of the United States except those States within district I and district V.
Page 104 - ... all surplus water over and above such actual appropriation and use, together with the water of all lakes, rivers, and other sources of water supply upon the public lands, and not navigable, shall remain and be held free for the appropriation and use of the. public for irrigation, mining, and manufacturing purposes subject to existing rights.
Page 16 - ... speaks not only in the same words, but with the same meaning and intent with which it spoke when it came from the hands of its framers, and was voted on and adopted by the people of the United States. Any other rule of construction would abrogate the judicial character of this court, and make it the mere reflex of the popular opinion or passion of the day.
Page 21 - Local self-government is that system of government under which the greatest number of minds, knowing the most, and having the fullest opportunities of knowing it, about the special matter in hand, and having the greatest interest in its well-working, have the management of it, or control over it.
Page 62 - ... and, in general, set forth such further requirements and safeguards as will protect the public interests and prevent injury to the said navigable rivers and the lands adjacent thereto, with such further conditions and limitations as will observe all the provisions of this act in relation to the working thereof and the payment of taxes on the gross proceeds...
Page 83 - The- United States can prohibit absolutely or fix the terms on which its property may be used. As it can withhold or reserve the land it can do so indefinitely, Stearns v. Minnesota, 179 US 243. It is true that the "United States do not and cannot hold property as a monarch may for private or personal purposes.
Page 97 - That nothing in this act shall be construed as affecting or intended to affect or to in any way interfere with the laws of any State or Territory relating to the control, appropriation, use, or distribution of water used in irrigation, or any vested right acquired thereunder...
Page 15 - It may be that such control would better be exercised in particular instances by the governments of the states, but the people will have the control they need, either from the states or from the National Government; and if the states fail to furnish it in due measure, sooner or later constructions of the Constitution will be found to vest the power where it will be exercised — in the National Government.
Page 15 - Public sentiment and action effect such changes, and the courts recognize them; but a court or legislature which should allow a change in public sentiment to influence it in giving to a written Constitution a construction not warranted by the intention of its founders would be justly chargeable with reckless disregard of official oath and public duty, and, if its course could become a precedent, these instruments would be of little avail.