The First Amendment and the Fourth Estate: The Law of Mass Media |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 85
Page 80
... ment to adversely affect the plaintiff , the reader must connect that statement with the plaintiff . The plaintiff must show that the state- ment objected to was " of and concerning " him . Sometimes this is a problem because of the ...
... ment to adversely affect the plaintiff , the reader must connect that statement with the plaintiff . The plaintiff must show that the state- ment objected to was " of and concerning " him . Sometimes this is a problem because of the ...
Page 350
... ment . " Bridges v . California , 314 U.S. , at 271. Our precedents leave little doubt as to the proper outcome of such an inquiry . In a series of cases raising the question of whether the contempt power could be used to punish out ...
... ment . " Bridges v . California , 314 U.S. , at 271. Our precedents leave little doubt as to the proper outcome of such an inquiry . In a series of cases raising the question of whether the contempt power could be used to punish out ...
Page 448
... ment and state shield - law objections that might be asserted in oppo- sition to compliance with a subpoena are largely irrelevant to deter- mining the legality of a search warrant under the Fourth Amend- ment . Of course , the Fourth ...
... ment and state shield - law objections that might be asserted in oppo- sition to compliance with a subpoena are largely irrelevant to deter- mining the legality of a search warrant under the Fourth Amend- ment . Of course , the Fourth ...
Contents
CHAPTER I | 1 |
B Antecedents | 8 |
Bases for Freedom of Communication | 16 |
Copyright | |
40 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action advertising Amendment rights appeal application asserted Branzburg broadcast candidate certiorari Chaplinsky charge citizens claim Columbia Broadcasting System commercial Commission Commission's concern concluded Congress consider constitutional Cox Broadcasting Corp criminal damages decided decision defamation defamatory defendant denied discussion dissenting editorial fact fairness doctrine Fourteenth Amendments free speech freedom of expression Gertz grand jury individual involved issue judgment judicial jurors Justice BRENNAN Justice Powell liability libel license limited majority material matter ment newspaper obscene opinion person petitioner plaintiff police political present prior restraint privilege problem programming protection public figure public interest public officials published question radio reason regulation rejected reporter respondent rule Simants sion Sixth Amendment standard statement stations statute supra Supreme Court television tion truth United violation York York Times Co