The Supreme Court: The Personalities and Rivalries That Defined America
A leading Supreme Court expert recounts the personal and philosophical rivalries that forged our nation's highest court and continue to shape our daily lives
The Supreme Court is the most mysterious branch of government, and yet the Court is at root a human institution, made up of very bright people with very strong egos, for whom political and judicial conflicts often become personal.
In this compelling work of character-driven history, Jeffrey Rosen recounts the history of the Court through the personal and philosophical rivalries on the bench that transformed the law--and by extension, our lives. The story begins with the great Chief Justice John Marshall and President Thomas Jefferson, cousins from the Virginia elite whose differing visions of America set the tone for the Court's first hundred years. The tale continues after the Civil War with Justices John Marshall Harlan and Oliver Wendell Holmes, who clashed over the limits of majority rule. Rosen then examines the Warren Court era through the lens of the liberal icons Hugo Black and William O. Douglas, for whom personality loomed larger than ideology. He concludes with a pairing from our own era, the conservatives William H. Rehnquist and Antonin Scalia, only one of whom was able to build majorities in support of his views.
Through these four rivalries, Rosen brings to life the perennial conflict that has animated the Court--between those justices guided by strong ideology and those who forge coalitions and adjust to new realities. He illuminates the relationship between judicial temperament and judicial success or failure. The stakes are nothing less than the future of American jurisprudence.
What people are saying - Write a review
All 2 reviews »
The Supreme Court: the personalities and rivalries that defined AmericaUser Review - Not Available - Book Verdict
The components of judicial decision making have been covered extensively in academic journals and books. Here, Rosen uses a historical context to examine the influence of judicial temperament on the ... Read full review
INTRODUCTION A QUESTION OF TEMPERAMENT
CHAPTER ONE THE VIRGINIA ARISTOCRATS
CHAPTER TWO THE LEGACY OF THE CIVIL WAR
CHAPTER THREE LIBERTY AND LICENSE
CHAPTER FOUR TWO FACES OF CONSERVATISM
CONCLUSION THE FUTURE OF TEMPERAMENT
Other editions - View all
African-Americans American Antonin Scalia appointed became believed bench Bill of Rights Black and Douglas Breyer Chief Justice civil rights Clarence Thomas colleagues Congress conservative constitutional contrast convicted critics decision declared defended deference deﬁne Deﬁner democratic dissenting opinion Douglas’s Dred Scott Earl Warren economic elected father Federalist ﬁnd ﬁrst ﬁve ﬂag Fourteenth Amendment framers Frankfurter free speech Holmes’s Hugo Black Ibid ideological inﬂuence insisted intellectual involving Jackson Jeffersonian John Marshall Harlan Joseph Story judges judicial philosophy judicial restraint judicial temperament Kennedy Kentucky Klan later Law School lawyer legislatures less liberal liberties Madison majority opinion Marbury Marshall’s ment moderate never O’Connor ofﬁce ofﬁcials Oliver Wendell Holmes opponents political pragmatic president presidential principles protect racial radical reﬂected regulate Rehn Rehnquist Republican Roberts Roosevelt segregation Senate stitutional strike Supreme Court Thomas Jefferson tion tional unanimous United uphold Vinson Virginia vision vote wrote York