Coping with Austerity: Poverty and Inequality in Latin America
Concern about the pervasiveness of poverty and income inequality in Latin America goes beyond the issue of social justice. The persistence of mass poverty and inequality pits different social groups against one another and leads to a polarization that makes consistent economic policy formation difficult. National productivity may also suffer in economies with poorly educated workforces lacking adequate health care. Statistics on poverty and inequality in Latin America are rudimentary and often conflicting. Yet it is known that poverty became more widespread in the region during the last decade as it experienced economic decline. About 180 million people, or two out of every five in the area, are now living in poverty—some 50 million more than in 1980. It is also known that income and wealth are far more unequally distributed in Latin America than in most other developing regions. This book provides a much-needed assessment of how poverty, inequality, and social indicators have fared in several Latin American countries over the past decade. Experts from Latin America and the U.S. focus attention on the extent of poverty and inequality and how they have been affected by the debt crisis and adjustment of the 1980s. They explain that issues of poverty and inequality were neglected as governments in Latin America struggled to restore stability and growth to their economies. Social sector spending declined sharply, affecting both the quality and quantity of services provided. The contributors examine how poverty and inequality are—or are not—being addressed in each country. They also explore the viability of alternative approaches to combating poverty and reducing inequality. They explain that virtually no one denies that governments must take a leading role in the provision of health, education, and other social services. Yet there are sharp debates--over the compatibility of social spending with economic adjustment and stabilization; the priority of social expenditures in relation to other governmental spending; the allocation of funds among different social programs; who should, and should not, benefit; and who should pay the costs. They show that the poor and middle sectors had to pay dearly because their governments, the international community, and the families themselves were not prepared to deal with austerity. The book contains eleven chapters by contributors from universities and research institutions in the U.S. and Latin America, as well as from international financial organizations. It is the result of a project cosponsored by Inter-American Dialogue.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
after the Crisis 198090
Income Inequality Trends in Latin America in the 1980s
A21 Probability of Belonging to the Bottom 20 Percent of
3A1 Income Survey Data Descriptions Seven Countries
Poverty Alleviation Income Distribution and Growth
4A1 Social Accounting Matrix Ecuador 1980
Five Criteria for Choosing among Poverty Programs
Social Policy and Adjustment during the 1980s
Welfare Inequality Poverty Social Indicators
Income Brazil 1970 1980 1990
Poverty Adjustment and Social Policies in the 1980s
of Total Programmable Expenditures Mexico 197090
Mexico 197071 to 199192
Other editions - View all
20 percent adjustment areas Argentina average benefits Brazil budget Buenos Aires capita income CEPAL changes Chile CIEPLAN CN CN Colombia Costa Rica costs countries crisis decade decline decreased deficit Development economic growth effects employment estimates exchange rate financing fiscal food commodity food stamp food stamp programs food subsidies greater Buenos Aires Grosh IBGE impact Income Distribution income inequality increased indicators infant mortality inflation Inter-American Development Bank investment Latin America Lustig macroeconomic ment Mexico minimum wage monetary nutritional oo oo pension Peru pobreza political poor population poverty and inequality poverty line primary Psacharopoulos public sector real wages recession reduce reforms result Rio de Janeiro rural Santiago share social funds social security social services social spending Source targeted Theil index tion transfer urban variables Venezuela Washington welfare workers World Bank
Page v - The President bears final responsibility for the decision to publish a manuscript as a Brookings book. In reaching his judgment on the competence, accuracy, and objectivity of each study, the President is advised by the director of the appropriate research program and weighs the views of a panel of expert outside readers who report to him in confidence on the quality of the work. Publication of a work signifies that it is deemed a competent treatment worthy of public consideration but does not imply...
Page v - Its principal purposes are to aid in the development of sound public policies and to promote public understanding of issues of national importance. The Institution was founded on December 8, 1927, to merge the activities of the Institute for Government Research, founded in 1916, the Institute of Economics, founded in 1922, and the Robert Brookings Graduate School of Economics and Government, founded in 1924. The Board of Trustees is responsible for the general administration of the Institution, while...